Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Saint Marcian of TortonaMar 6Chrodegang of MetzMarch 6Saint ColetteSaint Fridolin6 March postmarks6 March, by year

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

6 Mar

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Saint Sane

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
33.56% of network
(14.45M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (33.56%)
  • 6 March postmarks (2.74%)
  • Chrodegang of Metz (2.74%)
  • March 6 (2.74%)
  • Saint Colette (2.74%)
  • Saint Fridolin (2.74%)
  • Saint Marcian of Tortona (2.74%)
  • 6 March, by year (0.68%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Mar 6 49.32%
Influence Score
i
10.96% of network
(1.13)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.96%)
  • Mar 6 (12.33%)
  • 6 March postmarks (10.96%)
  • Chrodegang of Metz (10.96%)
  • March 6 (10.96%)
  • Saint Colette (10.96%)
  • Saint Fridolin (10.96%)
  • Saint Marcian of Tortona (10.96%)
  • 6 March, by year (10.96%)
Direct Connections 14

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 7) = 7
$outbound = max(1, 7) = 7

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 7 * 7 = 49
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 7 / 7 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 49 *
                           ( 72 [Mar 6] *
                            4 [6 March postmarks] *
                            4 [Chrodegang of Metz] *
                            4 [March 6] *
                            4 [Saint Colette] *
                            4 [Saint Fridolin] *
                            4 [Saint Marcian of Tortona] *
                            1 [6 March, by year]
                           )

                         = 14.45M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.13 [Mar 6] *
                            1 [6 March postmarks] *
                            1 [Chrodegang of Metz] *
                            1 [March 6] *
                            1 [Saint Colette] *
                            1 [Saint Fridolin] *
                            1 [Saint Marcian of Tortona] *
                            1 [6 March, by year]
                           )

                         = 1.13
Outbound 7 Tags on post
Inbound 7 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 49
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
33.56% (14.45M overall)
  • This Post (33.56%)
  • 6 March postmarks (2.74%)
  • Chrodegang of Metz (2.74%)
  • March 6 (2.74%)
  • Saint Colette (2.74%)
  • Saint Fridolin (2.74%)
  • Saint Marcian of Tortona (2.74%)
  • 6 March, by year (0.68%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Mar 6 49.32%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.96% (1.13 overall)
  • This Post (10.96%)
  • Mar 6 (12.33%)
  • 6 March postmarks (10.96%)
  • Chrodegang of Metz (10.96%)
  • March 6 (10.96%)
  • Saint Colette (10.96%)
  • Saint Fridolin (10.96%)
  • Saint Marcian of Tortona (10.96%)
  • 6 March, by year (10.96%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Mar 6 ↗
Str: 72Inf: 1.13
6 March postmarks ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Chrodegang of Metz ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
March 6 ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Saint Colette ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Saint Fridolin ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Saint Marcian of Tortona ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
6 March, by year ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
6 March, by year ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Saint Marcian of Tortona ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Saint Fridolin ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Saint Colette ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
March 6 ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Chrodegang of Metz ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
6 March postmarks ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Mar 6 ↗
Str: 72Inf: 1.13

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (7)
6 March postmarks
Chrodegang of Metz
Mar 6
March 6
Saint Colette
Saint Fridolin
Saint Marcian of Tortona
Inbound Posts (7)
Mar 6
6 March postmarks
Chrodegang of Metz
March 6
Saint Colette
Saint Fridolin
Saint Marcian of Tortona
Last calculated: Jun 24, 5:26 PM
20

Related Content

Topics

  • Chrodegang of Metz
  • March 6
  • Saint Colette
  • Saint Fridolin
  • Saint Marcian of Tortona
  • 6 March, by year
  • Mar 6
  • 6 March postmarks