Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Samuel Oschin telescopePalomar ObservatorySan Diego meetup May 2019Hale TelescopeGeorge Ellery Hale bust by Marian BreckenridgeDigitized Sky SurveyCarolyn Shoemaker

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

18-inch Schmidt camera

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

California Institute of Technology

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.45% of network
(896)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.45%)
  • Digitized Sky Survey (5.80%)
  • George Ellery Hale bust by Marian Breckenridge (5.80%)
  • Carolyn Shoemaker (1.45%)
  • Hale Telescope (1.45%)
  • Samuel Oschin telescope (1.45%)
  • San Diego meetup May 2019 (1.45%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Palomar Observatory 81.16%
Influence Score
i
12.28% of network
(1.14)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.28%)
  • Palomar Observatory (14.04%)
  • Carolyn Shoemaker (12.28%)
  • Digitized Sky Survey (12.28%)
  • George Ellery Hale bust by Marian Breckenridge (12.28%)
  • Hale Telescope (12.28%)
  • Samuel Oschin telescope (12.28%)
  • San Diego meetup May 2019 (12.28%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 56 [Palomar Observatory] *
                            1 [Carolyn Shoemaker] *
                            4 [Digitized Sky Survey] *
                            4 [George Ellery Hale bust by Marian Breckenridge] *
                            1 [Hale Telescope] *
                            1 [Samuel Oschin telescope] *
                            1 [San Diego meetup May 2019]
                           )

                         = 896

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.14 [Palomar Observatory] *
                            1 [Carolyn Shoemaker] *
                            1 [Digitized Sky Survey] *
                            1 [George Ellery Hale bust by Marian Breckenridge] *
                            1 [Hale Telescope] *
                            1 [Samuel Oschin telescope] *
                            1 [San Diego meetup May 2019]
                           )

                         = 1.14
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.45% (896 overall)
  • This Post (1.45%)
  • Digitized Sky Survey (5.80%)
  • George Ellery Hale bust by Marian Breckenridge (5.80%)
  • Carolyn Shoemaker (1.45%)
  • Hale Telescope (1.45%)
  • Samuel Oschin telescope (1.45%)
  • San Diego meetup May 2019 (1.45%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Palomar Observatory 81.16%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.28% (1.14 overall)
  • This Post (12.28%)
  • Palomar Observatory (14.04%)
  • Carolyn Shoemaker (12.28%)
  • Digitized Sky Survey (12.28%)
  • George Ellery Hale bust by Marian Breckenridge (12.28%)
  • Hale Telescope (12.28%)
  • Samuel Oschin telescope (12.28%)
  • San Diego meetup May 2019 (12.28%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Palomar Observatory ↗
Str: 56Inf: 1.14
Carolyn Shoemaker ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Digitized Sky Survey ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
George Ellery Hale bust by Marian Breckenridge ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Hale Telescope ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Samuel Oschin telescope ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
San Diego meetup May 2019 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
San Diego meetup May 2019 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Samuel Oschin telescope ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hale Telescope ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
George Ellery Hale bust by Marian Breckenridge ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Digitized Sky Survey ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Carolyn Shoemaker ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Palomar Observatory ↗
Str: 56Inf: 1.14

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Palomar Observatory
Inbound Posts (1)
Palomar Observatory
Last calculated: Jun 18, 10:12 PM
19

Related Content

Locations

  • Palomar Observatory

Topics

  • Carolyn Shoemaker
  • Digitized Sky Survey
  • George Ellery Hale bust by Marian Breckenridge
  • Hale Telescope
  • Samuel Oschin telescope
  • San Diego meetup May 2019