Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Latvia
Belarus
Liepāja
Riga
Jēkabpils
Vitebsk
Mogilev
Irving ThalbergAt a Loss
Ventspils

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Minsk

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Daugavpils
Belarus-Folk-Music
Objects in Latvia
Vitebsk
Lithuania in Russo-Ukrainian War
Grodno
Rēzekne
Valmiera
Military of Belarus
Brest
Gomel
Mogilev
Liepāja
Hiking in Latvia
Jelgava
Riga
Molchat-Doma-Discoteque-Official-Music-Video-Молчат-Дома-Дискотека
Society of Latvia
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
Jēkabpils
Ventspils
Jūrmala

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Irving Thalberg

Connected Musicians

  • Louis B. Mayer

Analyzing Network Connections...

Loading Map...

Nearest Locations

  • 📍
    Ars De Er0.3 km away
  • Thumbnail for Belarus
    Belarus42.3 km away
  • 📍
    BLR52.4 km away
  • 📍
    Saint George churches in Svajatyčy116.4 km away
  • 📍
    Polotsk-Lepel Partisan Zone158.0 km away

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
2.30% of network
(161.72B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (2.30%)
  • Vitebsk (2.59%)
  • Grodno (2.30%)
  • Gomel (1.72%)
  • Brest (1.15%)
  • Mogilev (1.15%)
  • Jēkabpils (1.15%)
  • Jūrmala (1.15%)
  • Rēzekne (1.15%)
  • Ventspils (0.57%)
  • Louis B. Mayer (0.57%)
  • Daugavpils (0.29%)
  • Liepāja (0.29%)
  • Riga (0.29%)
  • Valmiera (0.29%)
  • Ruba (0.29%)
  • Irving Thalberg (0.29%)
  • At a Loss (0.29%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Latvia 68.39%Belarus 13.79%
Influence Score
i
8.71% of network
(5.46)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.71%)
  • Grodno (8.71%)
  • Ventspils (8.71%)
  • Gomel (6.53%)
  • Latvia (5.29%)
  • Brest (4.35%)
  • Mogilev (4.35%)
  • Vitebsk (4.35%)
  • Daugavpils (4.35%)
  • Jēkabpils (4.35%)
  • Jūrmala (4.35%)
  • Liepāja (4.35%)
  • Rēzekne (4.35%)
  • Riga (4.35%)
  • Valmiera (4.35%)
  • Ruba (4.35%)
  • Irving Thalberg (4.35%)
  • At a Loss (4.35%)
  • Belarus (3.27%)
  • Louis B. Mayer (2.18%)
Direct Connections 6

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 4) = 4
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 4 * 2 = 8
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 4 / 2 = 2

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 19 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 8 *
                           ( 8 [Grodno] *
                            2 [Ventspils] *
                            6 [Gomel] *
                            238 [Latvia] *
                            4 [Brest] *
                            4 [Mogilev] *
                            9 [Vitebsk] *
                            1 [Daugavpils] *
                            4 [Jēkabpils] *
                            4 [Jūrmala] *
                            1 [Liepāja] *
                            4 [Rēzekne] *
                            1 [Riga] *
                            1 [Valmiera] *
                            1 [Ruba] *
                            1 [Irving Thalberg] *
                            1 [At a Loss] *
                            48 [Belarus] *
                            2 [Louis B. Mayer]
                           )

                         = 161.72B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 2 *
                           ( 2 [Grodno] *
                            2 [Ventspils] *
                            1.5 [Gomel] *
                            1.21 [Latvia] *
                            1 [Brest] *
                            1 [Mogilev] *
                            1 [Vitebsk] *
                            1 [Daugavpils] *
                            1 [Jēkabpils] *
                            1 [Jūrmala] *
                            1 [Liepāja] *
                            1 [Rēzekne] *
                            1 [Riga] *
                            1 [Valmiera] *
                            1 [Ruba] *
                            1 [Irving Thalberg] *
                            1 [At a Loss] *
                            0.75 [Belarus] *
                            0.5 [Louis B. Mayer]
                           )

                         = 5.46
Outbound 4 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 19 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 8
Base Node Influence 2
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
2.30% (161.72B overall)
  • This Post (2.30%)
  • Vitebsk (2.59%)
  • Grodno (2.30%)
  • Gomel (1.72%)
  • Brest (1.15%)
  • Mogilev (1.15%)
  • Jēkabpils (1.15%)
  • Jūrmala (1.15%)
  • Rēzekne (1.15%)
  • Ventspils (0.57%)
  • Louis B. Mayer (0.57%)
  • Daugavpils (0.29%)
  • Liepāja (0.29%)
  • Riga (0.29%)
  • Valmiera (0.29%)
  • Ruba (0.29%)
  • Irving Thalberg (0.29%)
  • At a Loss (0.29%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Latvia 68.39%Belarus 13.79%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.71% (5.46 overall)
  • This Post (8.71%)
  • Grodno (8.71%)
  • Ventspils (8.71%)
  • Gomel (6.53%)
  • Latvia (5.29%)
  • Brest (4.35%)
  • Mogilev (4.35%)
  • Vitebsk (4.35%)
  • Daugavpils (4.35%)
  • Jēkabpils (4.35%)
  • Jūrmala (4.35%)
  • Liepāja (4.35%)
  • Rēzekne (4.35%)
  • Riga (4.35%)
  • Valmiera (4.35%)
  • Ruba (4.35%)
  • Irving Thalberg (4.35%)
  • At a Loss (4.35%)
  • Belarus (3.27%)
  • Louis B. Mayer (2.18%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Grodno ↗
Str: 8Inf: 2
Ventspils ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
Gomel ↗
Str: 6Inf: 1.5
Latvia ↗
Str: 238Inf: 1.21
Brest ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Mogilev ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Vitebsk ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Daugavpils ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jēkabpils ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Jūrmala ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Liepāja ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Rēzekne ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Riga ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Valmiera ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ruba ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Irving Thalberg ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
At a Loss ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Belarus ↗
Str: 48Inf: 0.75
Louis B. Mayer ↗
Str: 2Inf: 0.5
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Louis B. Mayer ↗
Str: 2Inf: 0.5
Belarus ↗
Str: 48Inf: 0.75
At a Loss ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Irving Thalberg ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ruba ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Valmiera ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Riga ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Rēzekne ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Liepāja ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jūrmala ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Jēkabpils ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Daugavpils ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Vitebsk ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Mogilev ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Brest ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Latvia ↗
Str: 238Inf: 1.21
Gomel ↗
Str: 6Inf: 1.5
Ventspils ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
Grodno ↗
Str: 8Inf: 2

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (4)
At a Loss
BROKEN LINK
Belarus
Latvia
Louis B. Mayer
BROKEN LINK
Inbound Posts (2)
Latvia
Belarus
Last calculated: Jul 25, 1:06 PM
118

Related Content

Locations

  • Ruba

Nations

  • Belarus
  • Latvia

Regionals

  • Daugavpils
  • Jēkabpils
  • Jūrmala
  • Brest
  • Liepāja
  • Gomel
  • Rēzekne
  • Grodno
  • Riga
  • Mogilev
  • Valmiera
  • Vitebsk
  • Ventspils

Topics

  • At a Loss