Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Peru
Ica
Tumbes
Moquegua
Cuzco
Loreto Department
Tacna
Huancavelica
Huánuco
Lima

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 18 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Loreto

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Moquegua
Ayacucho
Tumbes
Puno
Madre de Dios
Huánuco
Tacna
Lambayeque
Cuzco
Cultural heritage monuments in Loreto
Lima
Apurímac
Ica
Piura
Huancavelica

Analyzing Network Connections...

Loading Map...

Nearest Locations

  • 📍
    Loreto Department144.3 km away
  • Thumbnail for Orellana Province
    Orellana Province283.4 km away
  • Thumbnail for Morona-Santiago Province
    Morona-Santiago Province315.1 km away
  • Thumbnail for Sucumbíos Province
    Sucumbíos Province372.9 km away
  • 📍
    Cojitambo409.1 km away

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.01% of network
(1.66M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.01%)
  • Ayacucho (1.51%)
  • Ica (1.01%)
  • Tumbes (0.76%)
  • Ancash (0.50%)
  • Apurímac (0.50%)
  • Cajamarca (0.50%)
  • Cuzco (0.50%)
  • Loreto Department (0.25%)
  • Huancavelica (0.25%)
  • Huánuco (0.25%)
  • Lambayeque (0.25%)
  • Lima (0.25%)
  • Madre de Dios (0.25%)
  • Moquegua (0.25%)
  • Piura (0.25%)
  • Puno (0.25%)
  • San Martin (0.25%)
  • Tacna (0.25%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Peru 90.93%
Influence Score
i
3.77% of network
(72)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (3.77%)
  • Tumbes (11.32%)
  • Ancash (7.55%)
  • Apurímac (7.55%)
  • Cajamarca (7.55%)
  • Cuzco (7.55%)
  • Ayacucho (5.66%)
  • Peru (3.77%)
  • Loreto Department (3.77%)
  • Huancavelica (3.77%)
  • Huánuco (3.77%)
  • Ica (3.77%)
  • Lambayeque (3.77%)
  • Lima (3.77%)
  • Madre de Dios (3.77%)
  • Moquegua (3.77%)
  • Piura (3.77%)
  • Puno (3.77%)
  • San Martin (3.77%)
  • Tacna (3.77%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 19 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 3 [Tumbes] *
                            2 [Ancash] *
                            2 [Apurímac] *
                            2 [Cajamarca] *
                            2 [Cuzco] *
                            6 [Ayacucho] *
                            361 [Peru] *
                            1 [Loreto Department] *
                            1 [Huancavelica] *
                            1 [Huánuco] *
                            4 [Ica] *
                            1 [Lambayeque] *
                            1 [Lima] *
                            1 [Madre de Dios] *
                            1 [Moquegua] *
                            1 [Piura] *
                            1 [Puno] *
                            1 [San Martin] *
                            1 [Tacna]
                           )

                         = 1.66M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 3 [Tumbes] *
                            2 [Ancash] *
                            2 [Apurímac] *
                            2 [Cajamarca] *
                            2 [Cuzco] *
                            1.5 [Ayacucho] *
                            1 [Peru] *
                            1 [Loreto Department] *
                            1 [Huancavelica] *
                            1 [Huánuco] *
                            1 [Ica] *
                            1 [Lambayeque] *
                            1 [Lima] *
                            1 [Madre de Dios] *
                            1 [Moquegua] *
                            1 [Piura] *
                            1 [Puno] *
                            1 [San Martin] *
                            1 [Tacna]
                           )

                         = 72
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 19 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.01% (1.66M overall)
  • This Post (1.01%)
  • Ayacucho (1.51%)
  • Ica (1.01%)
  • Tumbes (0.76%)
  • Ancash (0.50%)
  • Apurímac (0.50%)
  • Cajamarca (0.50%)
  • Cuzco (0.50%)
  • Loreto Department (0.25%)
  • Huancavelica (0.25%)
  • Huánuco (0.25%)
  • Lambayeque (0.25%)
  • Lima (0.25%)
  • Madre de Dios (0.25%)
  • Moquegua (0.25%)
  • Piura (0.25%)
  • Puno (0.25%)
  • San Martin (0.25%)
  • Tacna (0.25%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Peru 90.93%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
3.77% (72 overall)
  • This Post (3.77%)
  • Tumbes (11.32%)
  • Ancash (7.55%)
  • Apurímac (7.55%)
  • Cajamarca (7.55%)
  • Cuzco (7.55%)
  • Ayacucho (5.66%)
  • Peru (3.77%)
  • Loreto Department (3.77%)
  • Huancavelica (3.77%)
  • Huánuco (3.77%)
  • Ica (3.77%)
  • Lambayeque (3.77%)
  • Lima (3.77%)
  • Madre de Dios (3.77%)
  • Moquegua (3.77%)
  • Piura (3.77%)
  • Puno (3.77%)
  • San Martin (3.77%)
  • Tacna (3.77%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Tumbes ↗
Str: 3Inf: 3
Ancash ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
Apurímac ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
Cajamarca ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
Cuzco ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
Ayacucho ↗
Str: 6Inf: 1.5
Peru ↗
Str: 361Inf: 1
Loreto Department ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Huancavelica ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Huánuco ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ica ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Lambayeque ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lima ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Madre de Dios ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Moquegua ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Piura ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Puno ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
San Martin ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tacna ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Tacna ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
San Martin ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Puno ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Piura ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Moquegua ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Madre de Dios ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lima ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lambayeque ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ica ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Huánuco ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Huancavelica ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Loreto Department ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Peru ↗
Str: 361Inf: 1
Ayacucho ↗
Str: 6Inf: 1.5
Cuzco ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
Cajamarca ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
Apurímac ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
Ancash ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
Tumbes ↗
Str: 3Inf: 3

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Loreto Department
peru
Inbound Posts (2)
Peru
Loreto Department
Last calculated: Jun 11, 10:34 AM
Tigre, Loreto, Peru26

Related Content

Locations

  • Loreto Department

Nations

  • Peru

Regionals

  • Ayacucho
  • Madre de Dios
  • Cajamarca
  • Moquegua
  • Cuzco
  • Piura
  • Huancavelica
  • Puno
  • Huánuco
  • San Martin
  • Ica
  • Tacna
  • Ancash
  • Lambayeque
  • Tumbes
  • Apurímac
  • Lima