Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Electronic diagramsSam GendersHypothetical objectsSoftware modeling languageDiagramsMathematical modelsTim Diagram

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Conceptual models

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Metrominuto
Economic models
Economics
Information graphics
Modeling
Mathematical modeling

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Diagrams

Connected Musicians

  • Electronic diagrams
  • Sam Genders
  • Tim Diagram

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
65.45% of network
(2.6K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (65.45%)
  • Diagrams (16.36%)
  • Sam Genders (7.27%)
  • Mathematical models (3.64%)
  • Tim Diagram (1.82%)
  • Electronic diagrams (1.82%)
  • Hypothetical objects (1.82%)
  • Software modeling language (1.82%)
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(2)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Mathematical models (22.22%)
  • Diagrams (11.11%)
  • Sam Genders (11.11%)
  • Tim Diagram (11.11%)
  • Electronic diagrams (11.11%)
  • Hypothetical objects (11.11%)
  • Software modeling language (11.11%)
Direct Connections 12

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 6) = 6
$outbound = max(1, 6) = 6

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 6 * 6 = 36
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 6 / 6 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 36 *
                           ( 2 [Mathematical models] *
                            9 [Diagrams] *
                            4 [Sam Genders] *
                            1 [Tim Diagram] *
                            1 [Electronic diagrams] *
                            1 [Hypothetical objects] *
                            1 [Software modeling language]
                           )

                         = 2.6K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 2 [Mathematical models] *
                            1 [Diagrams] *
                            1 [Sam Genders] *
                            1 [Tim Diagram] *
                            1 [Electronic diagrams] *
                            1 [Hypothetical objects] *
                            1 [Software modeling language]
                           )

                         = 2
Outbound 6 Tags on post
Inbound 6 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 36
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
65.45% (2.6K overall)
  • This Post (65.45%)
  • Diagrams (16.36%)
  • Sam Genders (7.27%)
  • Mathematical models (3.64%)
  • Tim Diagram (1.82%)
  • Electronic diagrams (1.82%)
  • Hypothetical objects (1.82%)
  • Software modeling language (1.82%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (2 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Mathematical models (22.22%)
  • Diagrams (11.11%)
  • Sam Genders (11.11%)
  • Tim Diagram (11.11%)
  • Electronic diagrams (11.11%)
  • Hypothetical objects (11.11%)
  • Software modeling language (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Mathematical models ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
Diagrams ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Sam Genders ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Tim Diagram ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Electronic diagrams ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hypothetical objects ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Software modeling language ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Software modeling language ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hypothetical objects ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Electronic diagrams ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tim Diagram ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sam Genders ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Diagrams ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Mathematical models ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (6)
Diagrams
BROKEN LINK
Economic models
BROKEN LINK
Hypothetical objects
BROKEN LINK
Mathematical models
BROKEN LINK
Metrominuto
BROKEN LINK
Software modeling language
BROKEN LINK
Inbound Posts (6)
No other posts link to this one yet.
Last calculated: Jun 22, 1:56 PM
26

Related Content

Topics

  • Mathematical models
  • Hypothetical objects
  • Software modeling language