How is this calculated?
The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.
// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 4) = 4
$outbound = max(1, 4) = 4
// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 4 * 4 = 16
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 4 / 4 = 1
// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 26 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
= 16 *
( 36 [A.R.G.] *
36 [Aku Raaska] *
4 [Jari Kelloniemi] *
4 [Pasi Takkula] *
4 [Tepa Karjalainen] *
16 [Timo Hanhijoki] *
25 [Anger Cell] *
1 [Vesa Säkkinen] *
1 [Jani Vesanen] *
1 [Jouni Kurikka] *
1 [Maija Saari] *
225 [Pain Confessor] *
4 [Aki Kuusinen] *
1 [Joni Mäkelä] *
4 [Lauri Koskenniemi] *
1 [Mikko Kivimäki] *
1 [Riku Tolonen] *
1 [Tuomas Kuusinen] *
4 [Mikko Kivistö] *
9 [Janne Manninen (2)] *
1 [Mikko Laihanen] *
1 [Pasi Laihanen] *
1 [Samuli Federley] *
9 [Tomy Laisto] *
1 [Markku Kivistö] *
4 [Mikko Kivistö (2)]
)
= 2.48 x 10^15
Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
= 1 *
( 1 [A.R.G.] *
1 [Aku Raaska] *
1 [Jari Kelloniemi] *
1 [Pasi Takkula] *
1 [Tepa Karjalainen] *
1 [Timo Hanhijoki] *
1 [Anger Cell] *
1 [Vesa Säkkinen] *
1 [Jani Vesanen] *
1 [Jouni Kurikka] *
1 [Maija Saari] *
1 [Pain Confessor] *
1 [Aki Kuusinen] *
1 [Joni Mäkelä] *
1 [Lauri Koskenniemi] *
1 [Mikko Kivimäki] *
1 [Riku Tolonen] *
1 [Tuomas Kuusinen] *
1 [Mikko Kivistö] *
1 [Janne Manninen (2)] *
1 [Mikko Laihanen] *
1 [Pasi Laihanen] *
1 [Samuli Federley] *
1 [Tomy Laisto] *
1 [Markku Kivistö] *
1 [Mikko Kivistö (2)]
)
= 1
Outbound
4
Tags on post
Inbound
4
Posts tagging this
Connections
26
Total nodes
Base Node Strength
16
Base Node Influence
1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
3.88%
(2.48 × 1015 overall)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)Pain Confessor 54.61%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Connected Network Hierarchy
Sort list by:
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)