Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

S.M. (13)NegatorFinnskaldProscriptor McGovernWanja GrögerNachtgarmDavid Voigt (3)SamebrannTramheimBerthelm

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Trolfbert

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Negator

Connected Musicians

  • Berthelm
  • David Voigt (3)
  • Finnskald
  • Hjalmort
  • Nachtgarm
  • Proscriptor McGovern
  • S.M. (13)
  • Samebrann
  • Tramheim
  • Wanja Gröger

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.68% of network
(17.4K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.68%)
  • Berthelm (6.16%)
  • S.M. (13) (2.74%)
  • Wanja Gröger (2.74%)
  • Finnskald (0.68%)
  • Nachtgarm (0.68%)
  • Proscriptor McGovern (0.68%)
  • David Voigt (3) (0.68%)
  • Hjalmort (0.68%)
  • Samebrann (0.68%)
  • Tramheim (0.68%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Negator 82.88%
Influence Score
i
8.33% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Negator (8.33%)
  • Finnskald (8.33%)
  • Nachtgarm (8.33%)
  • Proscriptor McGovern (8.33%)
  • Berthelm (8.33%)
  • David Voigt (3) (8.33%)
  • Hjalmort (8.33%)
  • S.M. (13) (8.33%)
  • Samebrann (8.33%)
  • Tramheim (8.33%)
  • Wanja Gröger (8.33%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 11 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 121 [Negator] *
                            1 [Finnskald] *
                            1 [Nachtgarm] *
                            1 [Proscriptor McGovern] *
                            9 [Berthelm] *
                            1 [David Voigt (3)] *
                            1 [Hjalmort] *
                            4 [S.M. (13)] *
                            1 [Samebrann] *
                            1 [Tramheim] *
                            4 [Wanja Gröger]
                           )

                         = 17.4K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Negator] *
                            1 [Finnskald] *
                            1 [Nachtgarm] *
                            1 [Proscriptor McGovern] *
                            1 [Berthelm] *
                            1 [David Voigt (3)] *
                            1 [Hjalmort] *
                            1 [S.M. (13)] *
                            1 [Samebrann] *
                            1 [Tramheim] *
                            1 [Wanja Gröger]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 11 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.68% (17.4K overall)
  • This Post (0.68%)
  • Berthelm (6.16%)
  • S.M. (13) (2.74%)
  • Wanja Gröger (2.74%)
  • Finnskald (0.68%)
  • Nachtgarm (0.68%)
  • Proscriptor McGovern (0.68%)
  • David Voigt (3) (0.68%)
  • Hjalmort (0.68%)
  • Samebrann (0.68%)
  • Tramheim (0.68%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Negator 82.88%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.33% (1 overall)
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Negator (8.33%)
  • Finnskald (8.33%)
  • Nachtgarm (8.33%)
  • Proscriptor McGovern (8.33%)
  • Berthelm (8.33%)
  • David Voigt (3) (8.33%)
  • Hjalmort (8.33%)
  • S.M. (13) (8.33%)
  • Samebrann (8.33%)
  • Tramheim (8.33%)
  • Wanja Gröger (8.33%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Negator ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Finnskald ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Nachtgarm ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Proscriptor McGovern ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Berthelm ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
David Voigt (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hjalmort ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
S.M. (13) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Samebrann ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tramheim ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Wanja Gröger ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Wanja Gröger ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Tramheim ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Samebrann ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
S.M. (13) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Hjalmort ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
David Voigt (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Berthelm ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Proscriptor McGovern ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Nachtgarm ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Finnskald ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Negator ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Negator
Inbound Posts (1)
Negator
Last calculated: Jun 25, 4:34 PM
28

Related Content

No related content found.