Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Jake SuperchiPillorian
John Haughm
UadaElijah LoschNate VerschoorRobb BockmanStephen Parker (6)James Sloan (2)

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 5 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Trevor Matthews

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Pillorian
  • Uada

Connected Musicians

  • Elijah Losch
  • Jake Superchi
  • James Sloan (2)
  • John Haughm
    John Haughm band photo
  • Nate Verschoor
  • Robb Bockman
  • Stephen Parker (6)

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
4.04% of network
(419.9K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (4.04%)
  • Pillorian (9.09%)
  • Jake Superchi (9.09%)
  • Stephen Parker (6) (1.01%)
  • Elijah Losch (1.01%)
  • James Sloan (2) (1.01%)
  • Nate Verschoor (1.01%)
  • Robb Bockman (1.01%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
John Haughm 36.36%Uada 36.36%
Influence Score
i
10.00% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Pillorian (10.00%)
  • John Haughm (10.00%)
  • Stephen Parker (6) (10.00%)
  • Uada (10.00%)
  • Elijah Losch (10.00%)
  • Jake Superchi (10.00%)
  • James Sloan (2) (10.00%)
  • Nate Verschoor (10.00%)
  • Robb Bockman (10.00%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 9 [Pillorian] *
                            36 [John Haughm] *
                            1 [Stephen Parker (6)] *
                            36 [Uada] *
                            1 [Elijah Losch] *
                            9 [Jake Superchi] *
                            1 [James Sloan (2)] *
                            1 [Nate Verschoor] *
                            1 [Robb Bockman]
                           )

                         = 419.9K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Pillorian] *
                            1 [John Haughm] *
                            1 [Stephen Parker (6)] *
                            1 [Uada] *
                            1 [Elijah Losch] *
                            1 [Jake Superchi] *
                            1 [James Sloan (2)] *
                            1 [Nate Verschoor] *
                            1 [Robb Bockman]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
4.04% (419.9K overall)
  • This Post (4.04%)
  • Pillorian (9.09%)
  • Jake Superchi (9.09%)
  • Stephen Parker (6) (1.01%)
  • Elijah Losch (1.01%)
  • James Sloan (2) (1.01%)
  • Nate Verschoor (1.01%)
  • Robb Bockman (1.01%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
John Haughm 36.36%Uada 36.36%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.00% (1 overall)
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Pillorian (10.00%)
  • John Haughm (10.00%)
  • Stephen Parker (6) (10.00%)
  • Uada (10.00%)
  • Elijah Losch (10.00%)
  • Jake Superchi (10.00%)
  • James Sloan (2) (10.00%)
  • Nate Verschoor (10.00%)
  • Robb Bockman (10.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Pillorian ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
John Haughm ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Stephen Parker (6) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Uada ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Elijah Losch ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jake Superchi ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
James Sloan (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Nate Verschoor ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Robb Bockman ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Robb Bockman ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Nate Verschoor ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
James Sloan (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jake Superchi ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Elijah Losch ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Uada ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Stephen Parker (6) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John Haughm ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Pillorian ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Pillorian
Uada
Inbound Posts (2)
Pillorian
Uada
Last calculated: Jun 28, 12:55 PM
36

Related Content

No related content found.