Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Al Ciner
Chuck Findley
Ivan Neville
Larry DunnRufusNate MorganHigh Voltage (4)Rufus & Chaka Khan

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 6 hours ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Tony Maiden

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • High Voltage (4)
  • Rufus
  • Rufus & Chaka Khan

Connected Musicians

  • Al Ciner
    Al Ciner band photo
  • Chuck Findley
  • Ivan Neville
    Ivan Neville band photo
  • Larry Dunn
  • Nate Morgan

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
2.59% of network
(12.86B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (2.59%)
  • Ivan Neville (14.12%)
  • Rufus (7.20%)
  • Nate Morgan (4.61%)
  • Al Ciner (2.59%)
  • Larry Dunn (2.59%)
  • High Voltage (4) (1.15%)
  • Rufus & Chaka Khan (0.29%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Chuck Findley 64.84%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • High Voltage (4) (11.11%)
  • Rufus (11.11%)
  • Rufus & Chaka Khan (11.11%)
  • Chuck Findley (11.11%)
  • Nate Morgan (11.11%)
  • Ivan Neville (11.11%)
  • Al Ciner (11.11%)
  • Larry Dunn (11.11%)
Direct Connections 6

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 3) = 3
$outbound = max(1, 3) = 3

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 3 * 3 = 9
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 3 / 3 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 9 *
                           ( 4 [High Voltage (4)] *
                            25 [Rufus] *
                            1 [Rufus & Chaka Khan] *
                            225 [Chuck Findley] *
                            16 [Nate Morgan] *
                            49 [Ivan Neville] *
                            9 [Al Ciner] *
                            9 [Larry Dunn]
                           )

                         = 12.86B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [High Voltage (4)] *
                            1 [Rufus] *
                            1 [Rufus & Chaka Khan] *
                            1 [Chuck Findley] *
                            1 [Nate Morgan] *
                            1 [Ivan Neville] *
                            1 [Al Ciner] *
                            1 [Larry Dunn]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 3 Tags on post
Inbound 3 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 9
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
2.59% (12.86B overall)
  • This Post (2.59%)
  • Ivan Neville (14.12%)
  • Rufus (7.20%)
  • Nate Morgan (4.61%)
  • Al Ciner (2.59%)
  • Larry Dunn (2.59%)
  • High Voltage (4) (1.15%)
  • Rufus & Chaka Khan (0.29%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Chuck Findley 64.84%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • High Voltage (4) (11.11%)
  • Rufus (11.11%)
  • Rufus & Chaka Khan (11.11%)
  • Chuck Findley (11.11%)
  • Nate Morgan (11.11%)
  • Ivan Neville (11.11%)
  • Al Ciner (11.11%)
  • Larry Dunn (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
High Voltage (4) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Rufus ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Rufus & Chaka Khan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Chuck Findley ↗
Str: 225Inf: 1
Nate Morgan ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Ivan Neville ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Al Ciner ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Larry Dunn ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Larry Dunn ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Al Ciner ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Ivan Neville ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Nate Morgan ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Chuck Findley ↗
Str: 225Inf: 1
Rufus & Chaka Khan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Rufus ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
High Voltage (4) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (3)
High Voltage (4)
Rufus
Rufus & Chaka Khan
Inbound Posts (3)
High Voltage (4)
Rufus
Rufus & Chaka Khan
Last calculated: Jul 1, 1:00 AM
37

Related Content

No related content found.