Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Jason SutterLetters to Cleo
Tracy Bonham
Stacy JonesMichael EisensteinKay HanleyScott RieblingGreg McKenna

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 7 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Tom Polce

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Letters to Cleo

Connected Musicians

  • Greg McKenna
  • Jason Sutter
  • Kay Hanley
  • Michael Eisenstein
  • Scott Riebling
  • Stacy Jones
  • Tracy Bonham
    Tracy Bonham band photo

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.50% of network
(2.28M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.50%)
  • Letters to Cleo (32.00%)
  • Jason Sutter (4.50%)
  • Stacy Jones (4.50%)
  • Michael Eisenstein (2.00%)
  • Greg McKenna (0.50%)
  • Kay Hanley (0.50%)
  • Scott Riebling (0.50%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Tracy Bonham 55.00%
Influence Score
i
11.22% of network
(0.9091)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.22%)
  • Letters to Cleo (11.22%)
  • Jason Sutter (11.22%)
  • Stacy Jones (11.22%)
  • Greg McKenna (11.22%)
  • Kay Hanley (11.22%)
  • Michael Eisenstein (11.22%)
  • Scott Riebling (11.22%)
  • Tracy Bonham (10.20%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [Letters to Cleo] *
                            9 [Jason Sutter] *
                            9 [Stacy Jones] *
                            1 [Greg McKenna] *
                            1 [Kay Hanley] *
                            4 [Michael Eisenstein] *
                            1 [Scott Riebling] *
                            110 [Tracy Bonham]
                           )

                         = 2.28M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Letters to Cleo] *
                            1 [Jason Sutter] *
                            1 [Stacy Jones] *
                            1 [Greg McKenna] *
                            1 [Kay Hanley] *
                            1 [Michael Eisenstein] *
                            1 [Scott Riebling] *
                            0.9091 [Tracy Bonham]
                           )

                         = 0.9091
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.50% (2.28M overall)
  • This Post (0.50%)
  • Letters to Cleo (32.00%)
  • Jason Sutter (4.50%)
  • Stacy Jones (4.50%)
  • Michael Eisenstein (2.00%)
  • Greg McKenna (0.50%)
  • Kay Hanley (0.50%)
  • Scott Riebling (0.50%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Tracy Bonham 55.00%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.22% (0.9091 overall)
  • This Post (11.22%)
  • Letters to Cleo (11.22%)
  • Jason Sutter (11.22%)
  • Stacy Jones (11.22%)
  • Greg McKenna (11.22%)
  • Kay Hanley (11.22%)
  • Michael Eisenstein (11.22%)
  • Scott Riebling (11.22%)
  • Tracy Bonham (10.20%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Letters to Cleo ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Jason Sutter ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Stacy Jones ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Greg McKenna ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kay Hanley ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Eisenstein ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Scott Riebling ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tracy Bonham ↗
Str: 110Inf: 0.9091
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Tracy Bonham ↗
Str: 110Inf: 0.9091
Scott Riebling ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Eisenstein ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Kay Hanley ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Greg McKenna ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Stacy Jones ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Jason Sutter ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Letters to Cleo ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Letters to Cleo
Inbound Posts (1)
Letters to Cleo
Last calculated: Jun 23, 12:10 AM
21

Related Content

No related content found.