Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Jeremy GewertzEdward B. Gieda IIIAn AlbatrossPhillip Reynolds PriceDaniel SchlettJake LisowskiKat PaffettEdward KlingerJason HudakDan Kishbaugh

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Steven Vaiani

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • An Albatross
  • Edward B. Gieda III

Connected Musicians

  • Dan Kishbaugh
  • Daniel Schlett
  • Edward Klinger
  • Jake Lisowski
  • Jason Hudak
  • Jeremy Gewertz
  • Kat Paffett
  • Phillip Reynolds Price

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.69% of network
(2.8K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.69%)
  • Dan Kishbaugh (0.69%)
  • Daniel Schlett (0.69%)
  • Edward Klinger (0.69%)
  • Jake Lisowski (0.69%)
  • Jason Hudak (0.69%)
  • Kat Paffett (0.69%)
  • Phillip Reynolds Price (0.69%)
  • Edward B. Gieda III (0.69%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
An Albatross 76.39%Jeremy Gewertz 17.36%
Influence Score
i
9.01% of network
(1.1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.01%)
  • An Albatross (9.91%)
  • Jeremy Gewertz (9.01%)
  • Dan Kishbaugh (9.01%)
  • Daniel Schlett (9.01%)
  • Edward Klinger (9.01%)
  • Jake Lisowski (9.01%)
  • Jason Hudak (9.01%)
  • Kat Paffett (9.01%)
  • Phillip Reynolds Price (9.01%)
  • Edward B. Gieda III (9.01%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 110 [An Albatross] *
                            25 [Jeremy Gewertz] *
                            1 [Dan Kishbaugh] *
                            1 [Daniel Schlett] *
                            1 [Edward Klinger] *
                            1 [Jake Lisowski] *
                            1 [Jason Hudak] *
                            1 [Kat Paffett] *
                            1 [Phillip Reynolds Price] *
                            1 [Edward B. Gieda III]
                           )

                         = 2.8K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.1 [An Albatross] *
                            1 [Jeremy Gewertz] *
                            1 [Dan Kishbaugh] *
                            1 [Daniel Schlett] *
                            1 [Edward Klinger] *
                            1 [Jake Lisowski] *
                            1 [Jason Hudak] *
                            1 [Kat Paffett] *
                            1 [Phillip Reynolds Price] *
                            1 [Edward B. Gieda III]
                           )

                         = 1.1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.69% (2.8K overall)
  • This Post (0.69%)
  • Dan Kishbaugh (0.69%)
  • Daniel Schlett (0.69%)
  • Edward Klinger (0.69%)
  • Jake Lisowski (0.69%)
  • Jason Hudak (0.69%)
  • Kat Paffett (0.69%)
  • Phillip Reynolds Price (0.69%)
  • Edward B. Gieda III (0.69%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
An Albatross 76.39%Jeremy Gewertz 17.36%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.01% (1.1 overall)
  • This Post (9.01%)
  • An Albatross (9.91%)
  • Jeremy Gewertz (9.01%)
  • Dan Kishbaugh (9.01%)
  • Daniel Schlett (9.01%)
  • Edward Klinger (9.01%)
  • Jake Lisowski (9.01%)
  • Jason Hudak (9.01%)
  • Kat Paffett (9.01%)
  • Phillip Reynolds Price (9.01%)
  • Edward B. Gieda III (9.01%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
An Albatross ↗
Str: 110Inf: 1.1
Jeremy Gewertz ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Dan Kishbaugh ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Daniel Schlett ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Edward Klinger ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jake Lisowski ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jason Hudak ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kat Paffett ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Phillip Reynolds Price ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Edward B. Gieda III ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Edward B. Gieda III ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Phillip Reynolds Price ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kat Paffett ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jason Hudak ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jake Lisowski ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Edward Klinger ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Daniel Schlett ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dan Kishbaugh ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jeremy Gewertz ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
An Albatross ↗
Str: 110Inf: 1.1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
An Albatross
Inbound Posts (1)
An Albatross
Last calculated: Jun 25, 4:58 PM
13

Related Content

No related content found.