Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

David S. Ware
Sentimental Fools
Whit Dickey
Aum Fidelity
Matthew Shipp
Cooper-Moore3 Rocks & A Sock

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Steve Dalachinsky

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • 3 Rocks & A Sock
  • Aum Fidelity
  • Cooper-Moore
  • Sentimental Fools

Connected Musicians

  • David S. Ware
    David S. Ware band photo
  • Matthew Shipp
    Matthew Shipp band photo
  • Whit Dickey
    Whit Dickey band photo

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.41% of network
(663.55M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.41%)
  • Whit Dickey (22.50%)
  • David S. Ware (10.00%)
  • Aum Fidelity (3.13%)
  • Cooper-Moore (0.16%)
  • Sentimental Fools (0.16%)
  • 3 Rocks & A Sock (0.16%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Matthew Shipp 62.50%
Influence Score
i
12.82% of network
(0.8)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.82%)
  • David S. Ware (12.82%)
  • Cooper-Moore (12.82%)
  • Matthew Shipp (12.82%)
  • Whit Dickey (12.82%)
  • Sentimental Fools (12.82%)
  • 3 Rocks & A Sock (12.82%)
  • Aum Fidelity (10.26%)
Direct Connections 6

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 3) = 3
$outbound = max(1, 3) = 3

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 3 * 3 = 9
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 3 / 3 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 9 *
                           ( 64 [David S. Ware] *
                            1 [Cooper-Moore] *
                            400 [Matthew Shipp] *
                            144 [Whit Dickey] *
                            1 [Sentimental Fools] *
                            1 [3 Rocks & A Sock] *
                            20 [Aum Fidelity]
                           )

                         = 663.55M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [David S. Ware] *
                            1 [Cooper-Moore] *
                            1 [Matthew Shipp] *
                            1 [Whit Dickey] *
                            1 [Sentimental Fools] *
                            1 [3 Rocks & A Sock] *
                            0.8 [Aum Fidelity]
                           )

                         = 0.8
Outbound 3 Tags on post
Inbound 3 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 9
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.41% (663.55M overall)
  • This Post (1.41%)
  • Whit Dickey (22.50%)
  • David S. Ware (10.00%)
  • Aum Fidelity (3.13%)
  • Cooper-Moore (0.16%)
  • Sentimental Fools (0.16%)
  • 3 Rocks & A Sock (0.16%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Matthew Shipp 62.50%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.82% (0.8 overall)
  • This Post (12.82%)
  • David S. Ware (12.82%)
  • Cooper-Moore (12.82%)
  • Matthew Shipp (12.82%)
  • Whit Dickey (12.82%)
  • Sentimental Fools (12.82%)
  • 3 Rocks & A Sock (12.82%)
  • Aum Fidelity (10.26%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
David S. Ware ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Cooper-Moore ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Matthew Shipp ↗
Str: 400Inf: 1
Whit Dickey ↗
Str: 144Inf: 1
Sentimental Fools ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
3 Rocks & A Sock ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Aum Fidelity ↗
Str: 20Inf: 0.8
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Aum Fidelity ↗
Str: 20Inf: 0.8
3 Rocks & A Sock ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sentimental Fools ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Whit Dickey ↗
Str: 144Inf: 1
Matthew Shipp ↗
Str: 400Inf: 1
Cooper-Moore ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
David S. Ware ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (3)
3 Rocks & A Sock
Aum Fidelity
Sentimental Fools
Inbound Posts (3)
Aum Fidelity
Sentimental Fools
3 Rocks & A Sock
Last calculated: Jun 24, 10:17 AM
29

Related Content

No related content found.