Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Tony MenziesGreg Foxtrot Echo
Peter Christopherson
Genesis Breyer P OrridgeCOUM TransmissionsFizzey PeatC.C. NewbyJohn LaceyLes Maull

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 12 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Spydee (2)

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • COUM Transmissions

Connected Musicians

  • C.C. Newby
  • Fizzey Peat
  • Genesis Breyer P Orridge
  • Greg Foxtrot Echo
  • John Lacey
  • Les Maull
  • Peter Christopherson
    Peter Christopherson band photo
  • Tony Menzies

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.40% of network
(3.78M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.40%)
  • C.C. Newby (3.57%)
  • Genesis Breyer P Orridge (3.57%)
  • John Lacey (1.59%)
  • Fizzey Peat (0.40%)
  • Greg Foxtrot Echo (0.40%)
  • Les Maull (0.40%)
  • Tony Menzies (0.40%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Peter Christopherson 57.14%COUM Transmissions 32.14%
Influence Score
i
10.00% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Peter Christopherson (10.00%)
  • John Lacey (10.00%)
  • C.C. Newby (10.00%)
  • Genesis Breyer P Orridge (10.00%)
  • COUM Transmissions (10.00%)
  • Fizzey Peat (10.00%)
  • Greg Foxtrot Echo (10.00%)
  • Les Maull (10.00%)
  • Tony Menzies (10.00%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 144 [Peter Christopherson] *
                            4 [John Lacey] *
                            9 [C.C. Newby] *
                            9 [Genesis Breyer P Orridge] *
                            81 [COUM Transmissions] *
                            1 [Fizzey Peat] *
                            1 [Greg Foxtrot Echo] *
                            1 [Les Maull] *
                            1 [Tony Menzies]
                           )

                         = 3.78M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Peter Christopherson] *
                            1 [John Lacey] *
                            1 [C.C. Newby] *
                            1 [Genesis Breyer P Orridge] *
                            1 [COUM Transmissions] *
                            1 [Fizzey Peat] *
                            1 [Greg Foxtrot Echo] *
                            1 [Les Maull] *
                            1 [Tony Menzies]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.40% (3.78M overall)
  • This Post (0.40%)
  • C.C. Newby (3.57%)
  • Genesis Breyer P Orridge (3.57%)
  • John Lacey (1.59%)
  • Fizzey Peat (0.40%)
  • Greg Foxtrot Echo (0.40%)
  • Les Maull (0.40%)
  • Tony Menzies (0.40%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Peter Christopherson 57.14%COUM Transmissions 32.14%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.00% (1 overall)
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Peter Christopherson (10.00%)
  • John Lacey (10.00%)
  • C.C. Newby (10.00%)
  • Genesis Breyer P Orridge (10.00%)
  • COUM Transmissions (10.00%)
  • Fizzey Peat (10.00%)
  • Greg Foxtrot Echo (10.00%)
  • Les Maull (10.00%)
  • Tony Menzies (10.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Peter Christopherson ↗
Str: 144Inf: 1
John Lacey ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
C.C. Newby ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Genesis Breyer P Orridge ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
COUM Transmissions ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Fizzey Peat ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Greg Foxtrot Echo ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Les Maull ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tony Menzies ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Tony Menzies ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Les Maull ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Greg Foxtrot Echo ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Fizzey Peat ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
COUM Transmissions ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Genesis Breyer P Orridge ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
C.C. Newby ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
John Lacey ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Peter Christopherson ↗
Str: 144Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
COUM Transmissions
Inbound Posts (1)
COUM Transmissions
Last calculated: Jun 22, 4:35 AM
33

Related Content

No related content found.