Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

James Pinker
BRENDAN PERRY
Scott RodgerEthereal wave
DEAD CAN DANCE
Lisa GerrardPeter UlrichRichard Avison

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 5 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Simon Monroe

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • DEAD CAN DANCE
    DEAD CAN DANCE band photo

Connected Musicians

  • BRENDAN PERRY
    BRENDAN PERRY band photo
  • Ethereal wave
  • James Pinker
  • Lisa Gerrard
  • Peter Ulrich
  • Richard Avison
  • Scott Rodger

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.10% of network
(20.7K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.10%)
  • BRENDAN PERRY (9.89%)
  • Ethereal wave (9.89%)
  • James Pinker (4.40%)
  • Lisa Gerrard (1.10%)
  • Peter Ulrich (1.10%)
  • Richard Avison (1.10%)
  • Scott Rodger (1.10%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
DEAD CAN DANCE 70.33%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • DEAD CAN DANCE (11.11%)
  • James Pinker (11.11%)
  • BRENDAN PERRY (11.11%)
  • Lisa Gerrard (11.11%)
  • Peter Ulrich (11.11%)
  • Richard Avison (11.11%)
  • Scott Rodger (11.11%)
  • Ethereal wave (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [DEAD CAN DANCE] *
                            4 [James Pinker] *
                            9 [BRENDAN PERRY] *
                            1 [Lisa Gerrard] *
                            1 [Peter Ulrich] *
                            1 [Richard Avison] *
                            1 [Scott Rodger] *
                            9 [Ethereal wave]
                           )

                         = 20.7K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [DEAD CAN DANCE] *
                            1 [James Pinker] *
                            1 [BRENDAN PERRY] *
                            1 [Lisa Gerrard] *
                            1 [Peter Ulrich] *
                            1 [Richard Avison] *
                            1 [Scott Rodger] *
                            1 [Ethereal wave]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.10% (20.7K overall)
  • This Post (1.10%)
  • BRENDAN PERRY (9.89%)
  • Ethereal wave (9.89%)
  • James Pinker (4.40%)
  • Lisa Gerrard (1.10%)
  • Peter Ulrich (1.10%)
  • Richard Avison (1.10%)
  • Scott Rodger (1.10%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
DEAD CAN DANCE 70.33%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • DEAD CAN DANCE (11.11%)
  • James Pinker (11.11%)
  • BRENDAN PERRY (11.11%)
  • Lisa Gerrard (11.11%)
  • Peter Ulrich (11.11%)
  • Richard Avison (11.11%)
  • Scott Rodger (11.11%)
  • Ethereal wave (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
DEAD CAN DANCE ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
James Pinker ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
BRENDAN PERRY ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Lisa Gerrard ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Peter Ulrich ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Richard Avison ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Scott Rodger ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ethereal wave ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Ethereal wave ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Scott Rodger ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Richard Avison ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Peter Ulrich ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lisa Gerrard ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
BRENDAN PERRY ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
James Pinker ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
DEAD CAN DANCE ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
DEAD CAN DANCE
Inbound Posts (1)
DEAD CAN DANCE
Last calculated: Jun 15, 11:58 PM
34

Related Content

No related content found.