Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Ed Deane
Joe O’Donnell
Terry Woods
Gay Woods
The Woods BandPat Nash (2)Dave Browne (2)Steve Browne (3)Paul HarriganDavid “Sparky” Hughes

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 9 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Shane Martin

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • The Woods Band

Connected Musicians

  • Dave Browne (2)
  • David “Sparky” Hughes
  • Ed Deane
    Ed Deane band photo
  • Gay Woods
    Gay Woods band photo
  • Joe O’Donnell
    Joe O’Donnell band photo
  • Pat Nash (2)
  • Paul Harrigan
  • Steve Browne (3)
  • Terry Woods
    Terry Woods band photo

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.22% of network
(2.92B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.22%)
  • Terry Woods (21.93%)
  • The Woods Band (21.93%)
  • Joe O'Donnell (17.76%)
  • Gay Woods (5.48%)
  • Dave Browne (2) (0.22%)
  • Pat Nash (2) (0.22%)
  • Paul Harrigan (0.22%)
  • Steve Browne (3) (0.22%)
  • David "Sparky" Hughes (0.22%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Ed Deane 31.58%
Influence Score
i
9.09% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Ed Deane (9.09%)
  • Terry Woods (9.09%)
  • Gay Woods (9.09%)
  • Joe O'Donnell (9.09%)
  • The Woods Band (9.09%)
  • Dave Browne (2) (9.09%)
  • Pat Nash (2) (9.09%)
  • Paul Harrigan (9.09%)
  • Steve Browne (3) (9.09%)
  • David "Sparky" Hughes (9.09%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 144 [Ed Deane] *
                            100 [Terry Woods] *
                            25 [Gay Woods] *
                            81 [Joe O'Donnell] *
                            100 [The Woods Band] *
                            1 [Dave Browne (2)] *
                            1 [Pat Nash (2)] *
                            1 [Paul Harrigan] *
                            1 [Steve Browne (3)] *
                            1 [David "Sparky" Hughes]
                           )

                         = 2.92B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Ed Deane] *
                            1 [Terry Woods] *
                            1 [Gay Woods] *
                            1 [Joe O'Donnell] *
                            1 [The Woods Band] *
                            1 [Dave Browne (2)] *
                            1 [Pat Nash (2)] *
                            1 [Paul Harrigan] *
                            1 [Steve Browne (3)] *
                            1 [David "Sparky" Hughes]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.22% (2.92B overall)
  • This Post (0.22%)
  • Terry Woods (21.93%)
  • The Woods Band (21.93%)
  • Joe O'Donnell (17.76%)
  • Gay Woods (5.48%)
  • Dave Browne (2) (0.22%)
  • Pat Nash (2) (0.22%)
  • Paul Harrigan (0.22%)
  • Steve Browne (3) (0.22%)
  • David "Sparky" Hughes (0.22%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Ed Deane 31.58%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.09% (1 overall)
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Ed Deane (9.09%)
  • Terry Woods (9.09%)
  • Gay Woods (9.09%)
  • Joe O'Donnell (9.09%)
  • The Woods Band (9.09%)
  • Dave Browne (2) (9.09%)
  • Pat Nash (2) (9.09%)
  • Paul Harrigan (9.09%)
  • Steve Browne (3) (9.09%)
  • David "Sparky" Hughes (9.09%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Ed Deane ↗
Str: 144Inf: 1
Terry Woods ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Gay Woods ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Joe O'Donnell ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
The Woods Band ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Dave Browne (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pat Nash (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Harrigan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Browne (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
David "Sparky" Hughes ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
David "Sparky" Hughes ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Browne (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Harrigan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pat Nash (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dave Browne (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Woods Band ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Joe O'Donnell ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Gay Woods ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Terry Woods ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Ed Deane ↗
Str: 144Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
The Woods Band
Inbound Posts (1)
The Woods Band
Last calculated: Jun 23, 3:25 PM
38

Related Content

No related content found.