Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

douglas hyde
St. Laurence O’Toole Pipe Band
Arthur Griffith
PHOENIX PARK
Thomas ClarkePádraig Pearse

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Sean McDermott

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • St. Laurence O’Toole Pipe Band
    St. Laurence O’Toole Pipe Band band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Pádraig Pearse
  • Thomas Clarke

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.57% of network
(1.33M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.57%)
  • douglas hyde (36.36%)
  • PHOENIX PARK (36.36%)
  • St. Laurence O'Toole Pipe Band (20.45%)
  • Arthur Griffith (5.11%)
  • Pádraig Pearse (0.57%)
  • Thomas Clarke (0.57%)
Influence Score
i
14.29% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (14.29%)
  • St. Laurence O'Toole Pipe Band (14.29%)
  • douglas hyde (14.29%)
  • Arthur Griffith (14.29%)
  • Pádraig Pearse (14.29%)
  • PHOENIX PARK (14.29%)
  • Thomas Clarke (14.29%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 6 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 36 [St. Laurence O'Toole Pipe Band] *
                            64 [douglas hyde] *
                            9 [Arthur Griffith] *
                            1 [Pádraig Pearse] *
                            64 [PHOENIX PARK] *
                            1 [Thomas Clarke]
                           )

                         = 1.33M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [St. Laurence O'Toole Pipe Band] *
                            1 [douglas hyde] *
                            1 [Arthur Griffith] *
                            1 [Pádraig Pearse] *
                            1 [PHOENIX PARK] *
                            1 [Thomas Clarke]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 6 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.57% (1.33M overall)
  • This Post (0.57%)
  • douglas hyde (36.36%)
  • PHOENIX PARK (36.36%)
  • St. Laurence O'Toole Pipe Band (20.45%)
  • Arthur Griffith (5.11%)
  • Pádraig Pearse (0.57%)
  • Thomas Clarke (0.57%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
14.29% (1 overall)
  • This Post (14.29%)
  • St. Laurence O'Toole Pipe Band (14.29%)
  • douglas hyde (14.29%)
  • Arthur Griffith (14.29%)
  • Pádraig Pearse (14.29%)
  • PHOENIX PARK (14.29%)
  • Thomas Clarke (14.29%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
St. Laurence O'Toole Pipe Band ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
douglas hyde ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Arthur Griffith ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Pádraig Pearse ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
PHOENIX PARK ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Thomas Clarke ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Thomas Clarke ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
PHOENIX PARK ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Pádraig Pearse ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Arthur Griffith ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
douglas hyde ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
St. Laurence O'Toole Pipe Band ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
St. Laurence O'Toole Pipe Band
Inbound Posts (1)
St. Laurence O'Toole Pipe Band
Last calculated: Jun 27, 12:15 PM
47

Related Content

Figures

  • douglas hyde
  • Arthur Griffith

Locations

  • PHOENIX PARK