Network Profile
View Network Math
Overall Strength
2.64%
of network16 )
Direct Connections
6
Node & Network Strength Details
×
How is this calculated? The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the website.
Every tag forms a network link. The pie charts below show each connected post's base strength (PV) and influence (IV) as a share of this post's direct neighbourhood.
Outbound
3
Tags on post
Inbound
3
Posts tagging this
Base Node Strength
9
Base Node Influence
1
Connected Nodes
15
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
2.64%
(1.39 × 1016 overall)
This Post (2.64%) Craig Hooper (4.69%) Paul Hester (2) (4.69%) John Bliss (1.76%) Cathy McQuade (1.17%) John Clifforth (1.17%) Ken Campbell (3) (1.17%) Colin Newham (1.17%) Dave Mason (2) (1.17%) Karen Ansell (1.17%) Paul Abrahams (2) (1.17%) Stephan Fidock (1.17%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart) The Reels 29.33% Roger Mason 18.77% Paul Hester 14.37% Deckchairs Overboard 14.37%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
This Post (6.38%) Roger Mason (6.38%) Paul Hester (6.38%) Craig Hooper (6.38%) Deckchairs Overboard (6.38%) The Reels (6.38%) Paul Hester (2) (6.38%) Cathy McQuade (6.38%) John Clifforth (6.38%) Ken Campbell (3) (6.38%) Colin Newham (6.38%) Dave Mason (2) (6.38%) Karen Ansell (6.38%) Paul Abrahams (2) (6.38%) Stephan Fidock (6.38%) John Bliss (4.26%)
Connected Network (How neighbours affect this node)
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)
Last calculated math cycle: May 4, 6:33 AM
Close Report
Analyzing Network Connections...
Most Relevant
Most Integral
Depth: 1 Level
Depth: 2 Levels
Depth: 3 Levels
Depth: 4 Levels
Depth: 5 Levels
Depth: 6 Levels
Depth: 7 Levels
👁️ 27 ViewsRelated Content No related content found.