Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Mike Peters
Cancer Bats
End The
Liam Cormier
Richard GagnonMike Peters (2)Andrew McCrackenJaye R. SchwarzerDave PayantMike Haviland

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 5 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Scott Middleton

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Cancer Bats
    Cancer Bats band photo
  • End The

Connected Musicians

  • Andrew McCracken
  • Dave Payant
  • Jaye R. Schwarzer
  • Liam Cormier
    Liam Cormier band photo
  • Mike Haviland
  • Mike Peters
    Mike Peters band photo
  • Mike Peters (2)
  • Richard Gagnon

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
3.51% of network
(1.33M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (3.51%)
  • Dave Payant (0.88%)
  • Mike Haviland (0.88%)
  • Richard Gagnon (0.88%)
  • Andrew McCracken (0.88%)
  • Jaye R. Schwarzer (0.88%)
  • Mike Peters (2) (0.88%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Mike Peters 31.58%Cancer Bats 31.58%End The 14.04%Liam Cormier 14.04%
Influence Score
i
9.09% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • End The (9.09%)
  • Dave Payant (9.09%)
  • Mike Haviland (9.09%)
  • Richard Gagnon (9.09%)
  • Andrew McCracken (9.09%)
  • Mike Peters (9.09%)
  • Jaye R. Schwarzer (9.09%)
  • Liam Cormier (9.09%)
  • Mike Peters (2) (9.09%)
  • Cancer Bats (9.09%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 16 [End The] *
                            1 [Dave Payant] *
                            1 [Mike Haviland] *
                            1 [Richard Gagnon] *
                            1 [Andrew McCracken] *
                            36 [Mike Peters] *
                            1 [Jaye R. Schwarzer] *
                            16 [Liam Cormier] *
                            1 [Mike Peters (2)] *
                            36 [Cancer Bats]
                           )

                         = 1.33M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [End The] *
                            1 [Dave Payant] *
                            1 [Mike Haviland] *
                            1 [Richard Gagnon] *
                            1 [Andrew McCracken] *
                            1 [Mike Peters] *
                            1 [Jaye R. Schwarzer] *
                            1 [Liam Cormier] *
                            1 [Mike Peters (2)] *
                            1 [Cancer Bats]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
3.51% (1.33M overall)
  • This Post (3.51%)
  • Dave Payant (0.88%)
  • Mike Haviland (0.88%)
  • Richard Gagnon (0.88%)
  • Andrew McCracken (0.88%)
  • Jaye R. Schwarzer (0.88%)
  • Mike Peters (2) (0.88%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Mike Peters 31.58%Cancer Bats 31.58%End The 14.04%Liam Cormier 14.04%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.09% (1 overall)
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • End The (9.09%)
  • Dave Payant (9.09%)
  • Mike Haviland (9.09%)
  • Richard Gagnon (9.09%)
  • Andrew McCracken (9.09%)
  • Mike Peters (9.09%)
  • Jaye R. Schwarzer (9.09%)
  • Liam Cormier (9.09%)
  • Mike Peters (2) (9.09%)
  • Cancer Bats (9.09%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
End The ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Dave Payant ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Haviland ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Richard Gagnon ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Andrew McCracken ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Peters ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Jaye R. Schwarzer ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Liam Cormier ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Mike Peters (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Cancer Bats ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Cancer Bats ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Mike Peters (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Liam Cormier ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Jaye R. Schwarzer ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Peters ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Andrew McCracken ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Richard Gagnon ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Haviland ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dave Payant ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
End The ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Cancer Bats
End The
Inbound Posts (2)
End The
Cancer Bats
Last calculated: Jun 23, 11:13 AM
41

Related Content

No related content found.