Network Profile
View Network Math
Overall Strength
0.82%
of network15 )
Direct Connections
4
Node & Network Strength Details
×
How is this calculated? The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the website.
Every tag forms a network link. The pie charts below show each connected post's base strength (PV) and influence (IV) as a share of this post's direct neighbourhood.
Outbound
2
Tags on post
Inbound
2
Posts tagging this
Base Node Strength
4
Base Node Influence
1
Connected Nodes
18
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.82%
(5.72 × 1015 overall)
This Post (0.82%) Matt Hollywood (7.42%) Anton Newcombe (1.86%) Peter Hayes (1.86%) Hunter Crowley (1.86%) Joel Gion (1.86%) Dan Allaire (0.82%) Graham Bonnar (0.82%) Brad Artley (0.82%) Collin Hegna (0.82%) Dawn Thomas (2) (0.82%) Dean Taylor (0.82%) James Ambrose (0.82%) Jeff Davies (0.82%) Jeff Levitz (0.82%) Miranda Lee Richards (0.82%) Rick Maymi (0.82%) Travis Threlkel (0.82%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart) The Brian Jonestown Massacre 74.43%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
This Post (5.26%) The Brian Jonestown Massacre (5.26%) Anton Newcombe (5.26%) Dan Allaire (5.26%) Peter Hayes (5.26%) Graham Bonnar (5.26%) Brad Artley (5.26%) Collin Hegna (5.26%) Dawn Thomas (2) (5.26%) Dean Taylor (5.26%) Hunter Crowley (5.26%) James Ambrose (5.26%) Jeff Davies (5.26%) Jeff Levitz (5.26%) Joel Gion (5.26%) Matt Hollywood (5.26%) Miranda Lee Richards (5.26%) Rick Maymi (5.26%) Travis Threlkel (5.26%)
Connected Network (How neighbours affect this node)
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)
Last calculated math cycle: May 3, 6:12 PM
Close Report
Analyzing Network Connections...
Most Relevant
Most Integral
Depth: 1 Level
Depth: 2 Levels
Depth: 3 Levels
Depth: 4 Levels
Depth: 5 Levels
Depth: 6 Levels
Depth: 7 Levels
👁️ 31 ViewsRelated Content No related content found.