Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Tony Ashton
Chicken ShackDave WinthropBob Daisley
Paul Raymond
John GlascockAlan Powell
Christine McVie
Keef HartleyJimmie’s Chicken Shack

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 5 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Rob Hull

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Chicken Shack
  • Jimmie’s Chicken Shack

Connected Musicians

  • Alan Powell
  • Andy Silvester
  • Bob Daisley
  • Christine McVie
    Christine McVie band photo
  • Dave Bidwell
  • Dave Winthrop
  • John Glascock
  • Keef Hartley
  • Paul Butler (4)
  • Paul Hancox
  • Paul Martinez
  • Paul Raymond
    Paul Raymond band photo
  • Paul Raymond (2)
  • Robbie Blunt
  • Stan Webb (2)
  • Tony Ashton
    Tony Ashton band photo

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.07% of network
(1.11 × 1023)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.07%)
  • John Glascock (5.66%)
  • Andy Silvester (1.12%)
  • Christine McVie (0.63%)
  • Alan Powell (0.63%)
  • Paul Hancox (0.63%)
  • Robbie Blunt (0.63%)
  • Dave Winthrop (0.28%)
  • Dave Bidwell (0.28%)
  • Paul Martinez (0.28%)
  • Paul Raymond (2) (0.28%)
  • Paul Butler (4) (0.07%)
  • Stan Webb (2) (0.07%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Tony Ashton 22.64%Chicken Shack 22.64%Jimmie's Chicken Shack 15.72%Bob Daisley 13.70%Paul Raymond 7.69%Keef Hartley 6.99%
Influence Score
i
5.29% of network
(0.9091)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (5.29%)
  • Jimmie's Chicken Shack (5.29%)
  • Christine McVie (5.29%)
  • Bob Daisley (5.29%)
  • Dave Winthrop (5.29%)
  • Tony Ashton (5.29%)
  • Chicken Shack (5.29%)
  • Keef Hartley (5.29%)
  • John Glascock (5.29%)
  • Alan Powell (5.29%)
  • Paul Hancox (5.29%)
  • Andy Silvester (5.29%)
  • Robbie Blunt (5.29%)
  • Dave Bidwell (5.29%)
  • Paul Butler (4) (5.29%)
  • Paul Martinez (5.29%)
  • Paul Raymond (2) (5.29%)
  • Stan Webb (2) (5.29%)
  • Paul Raymond (4.81%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 18 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 225 [Jimmie's Chicken Shack] *
                            9 [Christine McVie] *
                            196 [Bob Daisley] *
                            4 [Dave Winthrop] *
                            324 [Tony Ashton] *
                            324 [Chicken Shack] *
                            100 [Keef Hartley] *
                            81 [John Glascock] *
                            9 [Alan Powell] *
                            9 [Paul Hancox] *
                            16 [Andy Silvester] *
                            9 [Robbie Blunt] *
                            4 [Dave Bidwell] *
                            1 [Paul Butler (4)] *
                            4 [Paul Martinez] *
                            4 [Paul Raymond (2)] *
                            1 [Stan Webb (2)] *
                            110 [Paul Raymond]
                           )

                         = 1.11 x 10^23

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Jimmie's Chicken Shack] *
                            1 [Christine McVie] *
                            1 [Bob Daisley] *
                            1 [Dave Winthrop] *
                            1 [Tony Ashton] *
                            1 [Chicken Shack] *
                            1 [Keef Hartley] *
                            1 [John Glascock] *
                            1 [Alan Powell] *
                            1 [Paul Hancox] *
                            1 [Andy Silvester] *
                            1 [Robbie Blunt] *
                            1 [Dave Bidwell] *
                            1 [Paul Butler (4)] *
                            1 [Paul Martinez] *
                            1 [Paul Raymond (2)] *
                            1 [Stan Webb (2)] *
                            0.9091 [Paul Raymond]
                           )

                         = 0.9091
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 18 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.07% (1.11 × 1023 overall)
  • This Post (0.07%)
  • John Glascock (5.66%)
  • Andy Silvester (1.12%)
  • Christine McVie (0.63%)
  • Alan Powell (0.63%)
  • Paul Hancox (0.63%)
  • Robbie Blunt (0.63%)
  • Dave Winthrop (0.28%)
  • Dave Bidwell (0.28%)
  • Paul Martinez (0.28%)
  • Paul Raymond (2) (0.28%)
  • Paul Butler (4) (0.07%)
  • Stan Webb (2) (0.07%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Tony Ashton 22.64%Chicken Shack 22.64%Jimmie's Chicken Shack 15.72%Bob Daisley 13.70%Paul Raymond 7.69%Keef Hartley 6.99%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
5.29% (0.9091 overall)
  • This Post (5.29%)
  • Jimmie's Chicken Shack (5.29%)
  • Christine McVie (5.29%)
  • Bob Daisley (5.29%)
  • Dave Winthrop (5.29%)
  • Tony Ashton (5.29%)
  • Chicken Shack (5.29%)
  • Keef Hartley (5.29%)
  • John Glascock (5.29%)
  • Alan Powell (5.29%)
  • Paul Hancox (5.29%)
  • Andy Silvester (5.29%)
  • Robbie Blunt (5.29%)
  • Dave Bidwell (5.29%)
  • Paul Butler (4) (5.29%)
  • Paul Martinez (5.29%)
  • Paul Raymond (2) (5.29%)
  • Stan Webb (2) (5.29%)
  • Paul Raymond (4.81%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Jimmie's Chicken Shack ↗
Str: 225Inf: 1
Christine McVie ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Bob Daisley ↗
Str: 196Inf: 1
Dave Winthrop ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Tony Ashton ↗
Str: 324Inf: 1
Chicken Shack ↗
Str: 324Inf: 1
Keef Hartley ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
John Glascock ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Alan Powell ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Paul Hancox ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Andy Silvester ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Robbie Blunt ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Dave Bidwell ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Paul Butler (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Martinez ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Paul Raymond (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Stan Webb (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Raymond ↗
Str: 110Inf: 0.9091
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Paul Raymond ↗
Str: 110Inf: 0.9091
Stan Webb (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Raymond (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Paul Martinez ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Paul Butler (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dave Bidwell ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Robbie Blunt ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Andy Silvester ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Paul Hancox ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Alan Powell ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
John Glascock ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Keef Hartley ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Chicken Shack ↗
Str: 324Inf: 1
Tony Ashton ↗
Str: 324Inf: 1
Dave Winthrop ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Bob Daisley ↗
Str: 196Inf: 1
Christine McVie ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Jimmie's Chicken Shack ↗
Str: 225Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Chicken Shack
Inbound Posts (1)
Chicken Shack
Last calculated: Jun 9, 3:41 PM
57

Related Content

No related content found.