Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Peter Salisbury
The Charlatans
Mark CollinsTony RogersDan HicksBaggyJon Brookes
Tim Burgess
Martin BluntJon Baker (11)

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 6 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Rob Collins

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Baz Ketley

Connected Bands/Artists

  • The Charlatans
    The Charlatans band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Baggy
  • Dan Hicks
  • Jon Baker (11)
  • Jon Brookes
  • Mark Collins
  • Martin Blunt
  • Peter Salisbury
    Peter Salisbury band photo
  • Tim Burgess
    Tim Burgess band photo
  • Tony Rogers

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.48% of network
(33.18M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.48%)
  • Dan Hicks (30.92%)
  • Baggy (7.73%)
  • Tim Burgess (4.35%)
  • Peter Salisbury (4.35%)
  • Mark Collins (1.93%)
  • Tony Rogers (0.48%)
  • Martin Blunt (0.48%)
  • Jon Brookes (0.48%)
  • Jon Baker (11) (0.48%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Charlatans 48.31%
Influence Score
i
9.09% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • The Charlatans (9.09%)
  • Dan Hicks (9.09%)
  • Tim Burgess (9.09%)
  • Tony Rogers (9.09%)
  • Peter Salisbury (9.09%)
  • Martin Blunt (9.09%)
  • Mark Collins (9.09%)
  • Jon Brookes (9.09%)
  • Jon Baker (11) (9.09%)
  • Baggy (9.09%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 100 [The Charlatans] *
                            64 [Dan Hicks] *
                            9 [Tim Burgess] *
                            1 [Tony Rogers] *
                            9 [Peter Salisbury] *
                            1 [Martin Blunt] *
                            4 [Mark Collins] *
                            1 [Jon Brookes] *
                            1 [Jon Baker (11)] *
                            16 [Baggy]
                           )

                         = 33.18M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [The Charlatans] *
                            1 [Dan Hicks] *
                            1 [Tim Burgess] *
                            1 [Tony Rogers] *
                            1 [Peter Salisbury] *
                            1 [Martin Blunt] *
                            1 [Mark Collins] *
                            1 [Jon Brookes] *
                            1 [Jon Baker (11)] *
                            1 [Baggy]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.48% (33.18M overall)
  • This Post (0.48%)
  • Dan Hicks (30.92%)
  • Baggy (7.73%)
  • Tim Burgess (4.35%)
  • Peter Salisbury (4.35%)
  • Mark Collins (1.93%)
  • Tony Rogers (0.48%)
  • Martin Blunt (0.48%)
  • Jon Brookes (0.48%)
  • Jon Baker (11) (0.48%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Charlatans 48.31%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.09% (1 overall)
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • The Charlatans (9.09%)
  • Dan Hicks (9.09%)
  • Tim Burgess (9.09%)
  • Tony Rogers (9.09%)
  • Peter Salisbury (9.09%)
  • Martin Blunt (9.09%)
  • Mark Collins (9.09%)
  • Jon Brookes (9.09%)
  • Jon Baker (11) (9.09%)
  • Baggy (9.09%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
The Charlatans ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Dan Hicks ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Tim Burgess ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Tony Rogers ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Peter Salisbury ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Martin Blunt ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mark Collins ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Jon Brookes ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jon Baker (11) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Baggy ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Baggy ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Jon Baker (11) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jon Brookes ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mark Collins ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Martin Blunt ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Peter Salisbury ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Tony Rogers ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tim Burgess ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Dan Hicks ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
The Charlatans ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
The Charlatans
Inbound Posts (1)
The Charlatans
Last calculated: Jun 12, 8:18 PM
43

Related Content

No related content found.