Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

ViolinskiBarry DunneryMik KaminskiJohn Hodgson (4)Iain WhitmoreJohn MarcangeloMichael d’Albuquerque

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Paul Mann (8)

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Violinski

Connected Musicians

  • Barry Dunnery
  • Iain Whitmore
  • John Hodgson (4)
  • John Marcangelo
  • Michael d’Albuquerque
  • Mik Kaminski

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.49% of network
(1.8K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.49%)
  • Mik Kaminski (13.43%)
  • Michael d'Albuquerque (5.97%)
  • Barry Dunnery (1.49%)
  • Iain Whitmore (1.49%)
  • John Hodgson (4) (1.49%)
  • John Marcangelo (1.49%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Violinski 73.13%
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Mik Kaminski (12.50%)
  • Violinski (12.50%)
  • Barry Dunnery (12.50%)
  • Iain Whitmore (12.50%)
  • John Hodgson (4) (12.50%)
  • John Marcangelo (12.50%)
  • Michael d'Albuquerque (12.50%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 9 [Mik Kaminski] *
                            49 [Violinski] *
                            1 [Barry Dunnery] *
                            1 [Iain Whitmore] *
                            1 [John Hodgson (4)] *
                            1 [John Marcangelo] *
                            4 [Michael d'Albuquerque]
                           )

                         = 1.8K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Mik Kaminski] *
                            1 [Violinski] *
                            1 [Barry Dunnery] *
                            1 [Iain Whitmore] *
                            1 [John Hodgson (4)] *
                            1 [John Marcangelo] *
                            1 [Michael d'Albuquerque]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.49% (1.8K overall)
  • This Post (1.49%)
  • Mik Kaminski (13.43%)
  • Michael d'Albuquerque (5.97%)
  • Barry Dunnery (1.49%)
  • Iain Whitmore (1.49%)
  • John Hodgson (4) (1.49%)
  • John Marcangelo (1.49%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Violinski 73.13%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Mik Kaminski (12.50%)
  • Violinski (12.50%)
  • Barry Dunnery (12.50%)
  • Iain Whitmore (12.50%)
  • John Hodgson (4) (12.50%)
  • John Marcangelo (12.50%)
  • Michael d'Albuquerque (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Mik Kaminski ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Violinski ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Barry Dunnery ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Iain Whitmore ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John Hodgson (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John Marcangelo ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael d'Albuquerque ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Michael d'Albuquerque ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
John Marcangelo ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John Hodgson (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Iain Whitmore ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Barry Dunnery ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Violinski ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Mik Kaminski ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Violinski
Inbound Posts (1)
Violinski
Last calculated: Jun 26, 11:17 AM
23

Related Content

No related content found.