Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Anthony PleethKatie WilkinsonChristopher van KampenBrindisi QuartetJonathan TunnellMichael StirlingJackie ShaveJacqueline Shave

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Patrick Kiernan

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Brindisi Quartet

Connected Musicians

  • Anthony Pleeth
  • Christopher van Kampen
  • Jackie Shave
  • Jacqueline Shave
  • Jonathan Tunnell
  • Katie Wilkinson
  • Michael Stirling

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.39% of network
(692.2K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.39%)
  • Christopher van Kampen (6.20%)
  • Katie Wilkinson (1.55%)
  • Jackie Shave (0.39%)
  • Jacqueline Shave (0.39%)
  • Jonathan Tunnell (0.39%)
  • Michael Stirling (0.39%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Anthony Pleeth 65.50%Brindisi Quartet 24.81%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Brindisi Quartet (11.11%)
  • Christopher van Kampen (11.11%)
  • Anthony Pleeth (11.11%)
  • Jackie Shave (11.11%)
  • Jacqueline Shave (11.11%)
  • Jonathan Tunnell (11.11%)
  • Katie Wilkinson (11.11%)
  • Michael Stirling (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [Brindisi Quartet] *
                            16 [Christopher van Kampen] *
                            169 [Anthony Pleeth] *
                            1 [Jackie Shave] *
                            1 [Jacqueline Shave] *
                            1 [Jonathan Tunnell] *
                            4 [Katie Wilkinson] *
                            1 [Michael Stirling]
                           )

                         = 692.2K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Brindisi Quartet] *
                            1 [Christopher van Kampen] *
                            1 [Anthony Pleeth] *
                            1 [Jackie Shave] *
                            1 [Jacqueline Shave] *
                            1 [Jonathan Tunnell] *
                            1 [Katie Wilkinson] *
                            1 [Michael Stirling]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.39% (692.2K overall)
  • This Post (0.39%)
  • Christopher van Kampen (6.20%)
  • Katie Wilkinson (1.55%)
  • Jackie Shave (0.39%)
  • Jacqueline Shave (0.39%)
  • Jonathan Tunnell (0.39%)
  • Michael Stirling (0.39%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Anthony Pleeth 65.50%Brindisi Quartet 24.81%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Brindisi Quartet (11.11%)
  • Christopher van Kampen (11.11%)
  • Anthony Pleeth (11.11%)
  • Jackie Shave (11.11%)
  • Jacqueline Shave (11.11%)
  • Jonathan Tunnell (11.11%)
  • Katie Wilkinson (11.11%)
  • Michael Stirling (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Brindisi Quartet ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Christopher van Kampen ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Anthony Pleeth ↗
Str: 169Inf: 1
Jackie Shave ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jacqueline Shave ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jonathan Tunnell ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Katie Wilkinson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Michael Stirling ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Michael Stirling ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Katie Wilkinson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Jonathan Tunnell ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jacqueline Shave ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jackie Shave ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Anthony Pleeth ↗
Str: 169Inf: 1
Christopher van Kampen ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Brindisi Quartet ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Brindisi Quartet
Inbound Posts (1)
Brindisi Quartet
Last calculated: Jun 22, 8:12 PM
21

Related Content

No related content found.