How is this calculated?
The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.
// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 4) = 4
$outbound = max(1, 4) = 4
// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 4 * 4 = 16
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 4 / 4 = 1
// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 26 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
= 16 *
( 24 [Fall Ov Serafim] *
121 [KATATONIA] *
961 [Dan Swanö] *
36 [Jonas Renkse] *
36 [Anders Nyström] *
64 [Fredrik Norrman] *
121 [Mattias Norrman] *
64 [Daniel Liljekvist] *
4 [Guillaume Le Huche] *
121 [Daniel Moilanen] *
4 [Per Eriksson (2)] *
1 [Mikael Oretoft] *
49 [Amaran] *
1 [Gunnar Hammar] *
4 [Robin Bergh] *
1 [Ronnie Backlund] *
4 [Kari Kainulainen] *
1 [Johanna De Pierre] *
1 [Mikael Andersson (11)] *
4 [Henrik Jansson] *
16 [Rapture] *
1 [Fredrik Lindgren] *
9 [Jens Kidman] *
169 [Christian Älvestam] *
4 [Steve Bannon] *
42 [Torchbearer]
)
= 7.12 x 10^29
Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
= 1 *
( 6 [Fall Ov Serafim] *
1 [KATATONIA] *
1 [Dan Swanö] *
1 [Jonas Renkse] *
1 [Anders Nyström] *
1 [Fredrik Norrman] *
1 [Mattias Norrman] *
1 [Daniel Liljekvist] *
1 [Guillaume Le Huche] *
1 [Daniel Moilanen] *
1 [Per Eriksson (2)] *
1 [Mikael Oretoft] *
1 [Amaran] *
1 [Gunnar Hammar] *
1 [Robin Bergh] *
1 [Ronnie Backlund] *
1 [Kari Kainulainen] *
1 [Johanna De Pierre] *
1 [Mikael Andersson (11)] *
1 [Henrik Jansson] *
1 [Rapture] *
1 [Fredrik Lindgren] *
1 [Jens Kidman] *
1 [Christian Älvestam] *
1 [Steve Bannon] *
0.8571 [Torchbearer]
)
= 5.14
Outbound
4
Tags on post
Inbound
4
Posts tagging this
Connections
26
Total nodes
Base Node Strength
16
Base Node Influence
1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.85%
(7.12 × 1029 overall)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)Dan Swanö 51.14%Christian Älvestam 8.99%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Connected Network Hierarchy
Sort list by:
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)