Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Jeff GeggusCockney RejectsAndy Scott (3)Andrew LaingVince RiordanLes CobbKeith WarringtonIan Campbell (14)Tony Van FraterMick Geggus

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 23 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Nigel Wolfe

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

419204289_933535428137703_2393727190076842625_n.jpg
IMG_0958.png

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Cockney Rejects

Connected Musicians

  • Andrew Laing
  • Andy Scott (3)
  • Ian Campbell (14)
  • Jeff Geggus
  • Keith Warrington
  • Les Cobb
  • Mick Geggus
  • Tony Van Frater
  • Vince Riordan

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.83% of network
(3.6K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.83%)
  • Andrew Laing (7.44%)
  • Keith Warrington (3.31%)
  • Andy Scott (3) (0.83%)
  • Ian Campbell (14) (0.83%)
  • Jeff Geggus (0.83%)
  • Les Cobb (0.83%)
  • Mick Geggus (0.83%)
  • Tony Van Frater (0.83%)
  • Vince Riordan (0.83%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Cockney Rejects 82.64%
Influence Score
i
9.09% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Andrew Laing (9.09%)
  • Cockney Rejects (9.09%)
  • Keith Warrington (9.09%)
  • Andy Scott (3) (9.09%)
  • Ian Campbell (14) (9.09%)
  • Jeff Geggus (9.09%)
  • Les Cobb (9.09%)
  • Mick Geggus (9.09%)
  • Tony Van Frater (9.09%)
  • Vince Riordan (9.09%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 9 [Andrew Laing] *
                            100 [Cockney Rejects] *
                            4 [Keith Warrington] *
                            1 [Andy Scott (3)] *
                            1 [Ian Campbell (14)] *
                            1 [Jeff Geggus] *
                            1 [Les Cobb] *
                            1 [Mick Geggus] *
                            1 [Tony Van Frater] *
                            1 [Vince Riordan]
                           )

                         = 3.6K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Andrew Laing] *
                            1 [Cockney Rejects] *
                            1 [Keith Warrington] *
                            1 [Andy Scott (3)] *
                            1 [Ian Campbell (14)] *
                            1 [Jeff Geggus] *
                            1 [Les Cobb] *
                            1 [Mick Geggus] *
                            1 [Tony Van Frater] *
                            1 [Vince Riordan]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.83% (3.6K overall)
  • This Post (0.83%)
  • Andrew Laing (7.44%)
  • Keith Warrington (3.31%)
  • Andy Scott (3) (0.83%)
  • Ian Campbell (14) (0.83%)
  • Jeff Geggus (0.83%)
  • Les Cobb (0.83%)
  • Mick Geggus (0.83%)
  • Tony Van Frater (0.83%)
  • Vince Riordan (0.83%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Cockney Rejects 82.64%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.09% (1 overall)
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Andrew Laing (9.09%)
  • Cockney Rejects (9.09%)
  • Keith Warrington (9.09%)
  • Andy Scott (3) (9.09%)
  • Ian Campbell (14) (9.09%)
  • Jeff Geggus (9.09%)
  • Les Cobb (9.09%)
  • Mick Geggus (9.09%)
  • Tony Van Frater (9.09%)
  • Vince Riordan (9.09%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Andrew Laing ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Cockney Rejects ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Keith Warrington ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Andy Scott (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ian Campbell (14) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jeff Geggus ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Les Cobb ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mick Geggus ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tony Van Frater ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Vince Riordan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Vince Riordan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tony Van Frater ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mick Geggus ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Les Cobb ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jeff Geggus ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ian Campbell (14) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Andy Scott (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Keith Warrington ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Cockney Rejects ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Andrew Laing ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Cockney Rejects
Inbound Posts (1)
Cockney Rejects
Last calculated: Jun 11, 3:35 PM
21

Related Content

No related content found.