Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Cut Copy – Point FMR – 2008 02 29
Bennett Foddy
Dan WhitfordIndietronicaNu-gazeAmbient pop
Cut Copy
Tim Hoeyand Mitchell ScottBen Browning

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Mitchell Scott

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Cut Copy
    Cut Copy band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Ambient pop
  • and Mitchell Scott
  • Ben Browning
  • Bennett Foddy
    Bennett Foddy band photo
  • Cut Copy – Point FMR – 2008 02 29
  • Dan Whitford
  • Indietronica
  • Nu-gaze
  • Tim Hoey

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.39% of network
(132.71M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.39%)
  • Ambient pop (25.10%)
  • Nu-gaze (25.10%)
  • Bennett Foddy (3.53%)
  • Indietronica (3.53%)
  • Dan Whitford (1.57%)
  • Ben Browning (0.39%)
  • and Mitchell Scott (0.39%)
  • Tim Hoey (0.39%)
  • Cut Copy - Point FMR - 2008 02 29 (0.39%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Cut Copy 39.22%
Influence Score
i
9.09% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Cut Copy (9.09%)
  • Ben Browning (9.09%)
  • and Mitchell Scott (9.09%)
  • Dan Whitford (9.09%)
  • Tim Hoey (9.09%)
  • Bennett Foddy (9.09%)
  • Cut Copy - Point FMR - 2008 02 29 (9.09%)
  • Ambient pop (9.09%)
  • Indietronica (9.09%)
  • Nu-gaze (9.09%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 100 [Cut Copy] *
                            1 [Ben Browning] *
                            1 [and Mitchell Scott] *
                            4 [Dan Whitford] *
                            1 [Tim Hoey] *
                            9 [Bennett Foddy] *
                            1 [Cut Copy - Point FMR - 2008 02 29] *
                            64 [Ambient pop] *
                            9 [Indietronica] *
                            64 [Nu-gaze]
                           )

                         = 132.71M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Cut Copy] *
                            1 [Ben Browning] *
                            1 [and Mitchell Scott] *
                            1 [Dan Whitford] *
                            1 [Tim Hoey] *
                            1 [Bennett Foddy] *
                            1 [Cut Copy - Point FMR - 2008 02 29] *
                            1 [Ambient pop] *
                            1 [Indietronica] *
                            1 [Nu-gaze]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.39% (132.71M overall)
  • This Post (0.39%)
  • Ambient pop (25.10%)
  • Nu-gaze (25.10%)
  • Bennett Foddy (3.53%)
  • Indietronica (3.53%)
  • Dan Whitford (1.57%)
  • Ben Browning (0.39%)
  • and Mitchell Scott (0.39%)
  • Tim Hoey (0.39%)
  • Cut Copy - Point FMR - 2008 02 29 (0.39%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Cut Copy 39.22%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.09% (1 overall)
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Cut Copy (9.09%)
  • Ben Browning (9.09%)
  • and Mitchell Scott (9.09%)
  • Dan Whitford (9.09%)
  • Tim Hoey (9.09%)
  • Bennett Foddy (9.09%)
  • Cut Copy - Point FMR - 2008 02 29 (9.09%)
  • Ambient pop (9.09%)
  • Indietronica (9.09%)
  • Nu-gaze (9.09%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Cut Copy ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Ben Browning ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
and Mitchell Scott ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dan Whitford ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Tim Hoey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Bennett Foddy ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Cut Copy - Point FMR - 2008 02 29 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ambient pop ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Indietronica ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Nu-gaze ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Nu-gaze ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Indietronica ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Ambient pop ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Cut Copy - Point FMR - 2008 02 29 ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Bennett Foddy ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Tim Hoey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dan Whitford ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
and Mitchell Scott ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ben Browning ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Cut Copy ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Cut Copy
Inbound Posts (1)
Cut Copy
Last calculated: Jun 19, 5:18 AM
36

Related Content

No related content found.