Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Pierre Schaffner
Dirk Verbeuren
Fabien W. FurterPiercing H.Pierrick ValencePol BanonFureissCedric LickelDamnsPatrick Martin

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 9 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Max Nomine

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Phazm

Connected Musicians

  • Cedric Lickel
  • Damns
  • Dirk Verbeuren
    Dirk Verbeuren band photo
  • Fabien W. Furter
  • Fureiss
  • Patrick Martin
  • Piercing H.
  • Pierre Schaffner
  • Pierrick Valence
  • Pol Banon

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.14% of network
(40.14M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.14%)
  • Pierrick Valence (1.24%)
  • Patrick Martin (0.55%)
  • Fabien W. Furter (0.55%)
  • Pierre Schaffner (0.55%)
  • Damns (0.14%)
  • Fureiss (0.14%)
  • Piercing H. (0.14%)
  • Cedric Lickel (0.14%)
  • Pol Banon (0.14%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Dirk Verbeuren 79.56%Phazm 16.71%
Influence Score
i
8.33% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Dirk Verbeuren (8.33%)
  • Phazm (8.33%)
  • Damns (8.33%)
  • Fureiss (8.33%)
  • Piercing H. (8.33%)
  • Pierrick Valence (8.33%)
  • Patrick Martin (8.33%)
  • Fabien W. Furter (8.33%)
  • Cedric Lickel (8.33%)
  • Pierre Schaffner (8.33%)
  • Pol Banon (8.33%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 11 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 576 [Dirk Verbeuren] *
                            121 [Phazm] *
                            1 [Damns] *
                            1 [Fureiss] *
                            1 [Piercing H.] *
                            9 [Pierrick Valence] *
                            4 [Patrick Martin] *
                            4 [Fabien W. Furter] *
                            1 [Cedric Lickel] *
                            4 [Pierre Schaffner] *
                            1 [Pol Banon]
                           )

                         = 40.14M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Dirk Verbeuren] *
                            1 [Phazm] *
                            1 [Damns] *
                            1 [Fureiss] *
                            1 [Piercing H.] *
                            1 [Pierrick Valence] *
                            1 [Patrick Martin] *
                            1 [Fabien W. Furter] *
                            1 [Cedric Lickel] *
                            1 [Pierre Schaffner] *
                            1 [Pol Banon]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 11 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.14% (40.14M overall)
  • This Post (0.14%)
  • Pierrick Valence (1.24%)
  • Patrick Martin (0.55%)
  • Fabien W. Furter (0.55%)
  • Pierre Schaffner (0.55%)
  • Damns (0.14%)
  • Fureiss (0.14%)
  • Piercing H. (0.14%)
  • Cedric Lickel (0.14%)
  • Pol Banon (0.14%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Dirk Verbeuren 79.56%Phazm 16.71%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.33% (1 overall)
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Dirk Verbeuren (8.33%)
  • Phazm (8.33%)
  • Damns (8.33%)
  • Fureiss (8.33%)
  • Piercing H. (8.33%)
  • Pierrick Valence (8.33%)
  • Patrick Martin (8.33%)
  • Fabien W. Furter (8.33%)
  • Cedric Lickel (8.33%)
  • Pierre Schaffner (8.33%)
  • Pol Banon (8.33%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Dirk Verbeuren ↗
Str: 576Inf: 1
Phazm ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Damns ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Fureiss ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Piercing H. ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pierrick Valence ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Patrick Martin ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Fabien W. Furter ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Cedric Lickel ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pierre Schaffner ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Pol Banon ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Pol Banon ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pierre Schaffner ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Cedric Lickel ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Fabien W. Furter ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Patrick Martin ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Pierrick Valence ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Piercing H. ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Fureiss ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Damns ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Phazm ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Dirk Verbeuren ↗
Str: 576Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Phazm
Inbound Posts (1)
Phazm
Last calculated: Jun 9, 7:37 PM
20

Related Content

No related content found.