Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Henry RantaKlas IdebergJens BromanThe DefacedRobert Hansson (4)Henrik PommerJörgen LöfbergHenrik Sjöwall

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 7 days ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Mattias Svensson (8)

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • The Defaced

Connected Musicians

  • Henrik Pommer
  • Henrik Sjöwall
  • Henry Ranta
  • Jörgen Löfberg
  • Jens Broman
  • Klas Ideberg
  • Robert Hansson (4)

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.04% of network
(65.5K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.04%)
  • Henry Ranta (16.67%)
  • Klas Ideberg (4.17%)
  • Jens Broman (4.17%)
  • Jörgen Löfberg (4.17%)
  • Henrik Pommer (1.04%)
  • Robert Hansson (4) (1.04%)
  • Henrik Sjöwall (1.04%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Defaced 66.67%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • The Defaced (11.11%)
  • Klas Ideberg (11.11%)
  • Henry Ranta (11.11%)
  • Henrik Pommer (11.11%)
  • Jens Broman (11.11%)
  • Robert Hansson (4) (11.11%)
  • Henrik Sjöwall (11.11%)
  • Jörgen Löfberg (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [The Defaced] *
                            4 [Klas Ideberg] *
                            16 [Henry Ranta] *
                            1 [Henrik Pommer] *
                            4 [Jens Broman] *
                            1 [Robert Hansson (4)] *
                            1 [Henrik Sjöwall] *
                            4 [Jörgen Löfberg]
                           )

                         = 65.5K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [The Defaced] *
                            1 [Klas Ideberg] *
                            1 [Henry Ranta] *
                            1 [Henrik Pommer] *
                            1 [Jens Broman] *
                            1 [Robert Hansson (4)] *
                            1 [Henrik Sjöwall] *
                            1 [Jörgen Löfberg]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.04% (65.5K overall)
  • This Post (1.04%)
  • Henry Ranta (16.67%)
  • Klas Ideberg (4.17%)
  • Jens Broman (4.17%)
  • Jörgen Löfberg (4.17%)
  • Henrik Pommer (1.04%)
  • Robert Hansson (4) (1.04%)
  • Henrik Sjöwall (1.04%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Defaced 66.67%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • The Defaced (11.11%)
  • Klas Ideberg (11.11%)
  • Henry Ranta (11.11%)
  • Henrik Pommer (11.11%)
  • Jens Broman (11.11%)
  • Robert Hansson (4) (11.11%)
  • Henrik Sjöwall (11.11%)
  • Jörgen Löfberg (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
The Defaced ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Klas Ideberg ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Henry Ranta ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Henrik Pommer ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jens Broman ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Robert Hansson (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Henrik Sjöwall ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jörgen Löfberg ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Jörgen Löfberg ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Henrik Sjöwall ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Robert Hansson (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jens Broman ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Henrik Pommer ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Henry Ranta ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Klas Ideberg ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
The Defaced ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
The Defaced
Inbound Posts (1)
The Defaced
Last calculated: Sep 7, 9:03 AM
42

Related Content

No related content found.