Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Marcus E. NormanKristoffer OliviusMorgan HanssonMattias HolmgrenNaglfarAndreas NilssonUlf Andersson (2)Jens Rydén

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 23 hours ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Mattias Grahn

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Morgan Hansson
  • Naglfar

Connected Musicians

  • Andreas Nilsson
  • Jens Rydén
  • Kristoffer Olivius
  • Marcus E. Norman
  • Mattias Holmgren
  • Ulf Andersson (2)

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.91% of network
(9.44M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.91%)
  • Marcus E. Norman (14.55%)
  • Ulf Andersson (2) (8.18%)
  • Andreas Nilsson (3.64%)
  • Kristoffer Olivius (3.64%)
  • Mattias Holmgren (3.64%)
  • Morgan Hansson (3.64%)
  • Jens Rydén (3.64%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Naglfar 58.18%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Naglfar (11.11%)
  • Andreas Nilsson (11.11%)
  • Kristoffer Olivius (11.11%)
  • Marcus E. Norman (11.11%)
  • Mattias Holmgren (11.11%)
  • Morgan Hansson (11.11%)
  • Ulf Andersson (2) (11.11%)
  • Jens Rydén (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [Naglfar] *
                            4 [Andreas Nilsson] *
                            4 [Kristoffer Olivius] *
                            16 [Marcus E. Norman] *
                            4 [Mattias Holmgren] *
                            4 [Morgan Hansson] *
                            9 [Ulf Andersson (2)] *
                            4 [Jens Rydén]
                           )

                         = 9.44M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Naglfar] *
                            1 [Andreas Nilsson] *
                            1 [Kristoffer Olivius] *
                            1 [Marcus E. Norman] *
                            1 [Mattias Holmgren] *
                            1 [Morgan Hansson] *
                            1 [Ulf Andersson (2)] *
                            1 [Jens Rydén]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.91% (9.44M overall)
  • This Post (0.91%)
  • Marcus E. Norman (14.55%)
  • Ulf Andersson (2) (8.18%)
  • Andreas Nilsson (3.64%)
  • Kristoffer Olivius (3.64%)
  • Mattias Holmgren (3.64%)
  • Morgan Hansson (3.64%)
  • Jens Rydén (3.64%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Naglfar 58.18%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Naglfar (11.11%)
  • Andreas Nilsson (11.11%)
  • Kristoffer Olivius (11.11%)
  • Marcus E. Norman (11.11%)
  • Mattias Holmgren (11.11%)
  • Morgan Hansson (11.11%)
  • Ulf Andersson (2) (11.11%)
  • Jens Rydén (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Naglfar ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Andreas Nilsson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Kristoffer Olivius ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Marcus E. Norman ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Mattias Holmgren ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Morgan Hansson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Ulf Andersson (2) ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Jens Rydén ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Jens Rydén ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Ulf Andersson (2) ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Morgan Hansson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Mattias Holmgren ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Marcus E. Norman ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Kristoffer Olivius ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Andreas Nilsson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Naglfar ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Naglfar
Inbound Posts (1)
Naglfar
Last calculated: Jul 2, 11:45 AM
22

Related Content

No related content found.