How is this calculated?
The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.
// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2
// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1
// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 25 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
= 4 *
( 121 [Crystalic] *
25 [Matti Auerkallio] *
9 [Mikko Mattila] *
4 [Janne Juutinen] *
16 [Timo Hanhijoki] *
4 [Arto Tissari] *
4 [Felipe Muñoz (2)] *
1 [Janne Noponen] *
1 [Jarno F. Moberg] *
1 [Marko Eskola] *
1 [Niko Rauhala] *
225 [Korpiklaani] *
4 [Jarkko Aaltonen] *
1 [Jonne Järvelä] *
1 [Kalle "Cane" Savijärvi] *
1 [Matson Johansson] *
1 [Sami Perttula] *
1 [Tuomas Rounakari] *
1 [Juho Kauppinen] *
1 [Cane (3)] *
4 [Honka] *
1 [Jaakko Lemmetty] *
9 [Janne Leinonen] *
4 [Samuli Mikkonen (2)] *
1 [Ali Määttä]
)
= 14.45T
Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
= 1 *
( 1 [Crystalic] *
1 [Matti Auerkallio] *
1 [Mikko Mattila] *
1 [Janne Juutinen] *
1 [Timo Hanhijoki] *
1 [Arto Tissari] *
1 [Felipe Muñoz (2)] *
1 [Janne Noponen] *
1 [Jarno F. Moberg] *
1 [Marko Eskola] *
1 [Niko Rauhala] *
1 [Korpiklaani] *
1 [Jarkko Aaltonen] *
1 [Jonne Järvelä] *
1 [Kalle "Cane" Savijärvi] *
1 [Matson Johansson] *
1 [Sami Perttula] *
1 [Tuomas Rounakari] *
1 [Juho Kauppinen] *
1 [Cane (3)] *
1 [Honka] *
1 [Jaakko Lemmetty] *
1 [Janne Leinonen] *
1 [Samuli Mikkonen (2)] *
1 [Ali Määttä]
)
= 1
Outbound
2
Tags on post
Inbound
2
Posts tagging this
Connections
25
Total nodes
Base Node Strength
4
Base Node Influence
1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)Korpiklaani 50.45%Crystalic 27.13%Matti Auerkallio 5.61%Timo Hanhijoki 3.59%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Connected Network Hierarchy
Sort list by:
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)