Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Tigers JawMike ArmstrongCitizenCray WilsonEric HammRyland OehlersNick HammCitiZen (10)Jake Duhaime

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Mat Kerekes

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Citizen
  • CitiZen (10)
  • Tigers Jaw

Connected Musicians

  • Cray Wilson
  • Jake Duhaime
  • Mike Armstrong
  • Nick Hamm
  • Ryland Oehlers

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
4.71% of network
(10.8K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (4.71%)
  • Tigers Jaw (3.53%)
  • Cray Wilson (1.18%)
  • Jake Duhaime (1.18%)
  • Mike Armstrong (1.18%)
  • Nick Hamm (1.18%)
  • Ryland Oehlers (1.18%)
  • CitiZen (10) (1.18%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Citizen 65.88%Eric Hamm 18.82%
Influence Score
i
8.42% of network
(2.63)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.42%)
  • Tigers Jaw (25.26%)
  • Cray Wilson (8.42%)
  • Eric Hamm (8.42%)
  • Jake Duhaime (8.42%)
  • Mike Armstrong (8.42%)
  • Nick Hamm (8.42%)
  • Ryland Oehlers (8.42%)
  • CitiZen (10) (8.42%)
  • Citizen (7.37%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 3 [Tigers Jaw] *
                            1 [Cray Wilson] *
                            16 [Eric Hamm] *
                            1 [Jake Duhaime] *
                            1 [Mike Armstrong] *
                            1 [Nick Hamm] *
                            1 [Ryland Oehlers] *
                            1 [CitiZen (10)] *
                            56 [Citizen]
                           )

                         = 10.8K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 3 [Tigers Jaw] *
                            1 [Cray Wilson] *
                            1 [Eric Hamm] *
                            1 [Jake Duhaime] *
                            1 [Mike Armstrong] *
                            1 [Nick Hamm] *
                            1 [Ryland Oehlers] *
                            1 [CitiZen (10)] *
                            0.875 [Citizen]
                           )

                         = 2.63
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
4.71% (10.8K overall)
  • This Post (4.71%)
  • Tigers Jaw (3.53%)
  • Cray Wilson (1.18%)
  • Jake Duhaime (1.18%)
  • Mike Armstrong (1.18%)
  • Nick Hamm (1.18%)
  • Ryland Oehlers (1.18%)
  • CitiZen (10) (1.18%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Citizen 65.88%Eric Hamm 18.82%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.42% (2.63 overall)
  • This Post (8.42%)
  • Tigers Jaw (25.26%)
  • Cray Wilson (8.42%)
  • Eric Hamm (8.42%)
  • Jake Duhaime (8.42%)
  • Mike Armstrong (8.42%)
  • Nick Hamm (8.42%)
  • Ryland Oehlers (8.42%)
  • CitiZen (10) (8.42%)
  • Citizen (7.37%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Tigers Jaw ↗
Str: 3Inf: 3
Cray Wilson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eric Hamm ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Jake Duhaime ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Armstrong ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Nick Hamm ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ryland Oehlers ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
CitiZen (10) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Citizen ↗
Str: 56Inf: 0.875
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Citizen ↗
Str: 56Inf: 0.875
CitiZen (10) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ryland Oehlers ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Nick Hamm ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Armstrong ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jake Duhaime ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eric Hamm ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Cray Wilson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tigers Jaw ↗
Str: 3Inf: 3

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Citizen
CitiZen (10)
Inbound Posts (2)
Citizen
CitiZen (10)
Last calculated: Jul 2, 3:04 PM
176

Related Content

Figures

  • Eric Hamm