Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

THE WALKMEN
Luke TempleWalter MartinFlashy PythonPeter Matthew Bauer
Hamilton Leithauser
Paul MaroonMatt BarrickPeter BauerMuzz

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Light Heat

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • THE WALKMEN
    THE WALKMEN band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Flashy Python
  • Hamilton Leithauser
    Hamilton Leithauser band photo
  • Luke Temple
  • Matt Barrick
  • Muzz
  • Paul Maroon
  • Peter Bauer
  • Peter Bauer (2)
  • Peter Matthew Bauer
  • Walter Martin

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.49% of network
(114.96M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.49%)
  • Luke Temple (4.41%)
  • Muzz (4.41%)
  • Matt Barrick (4.41%)
  • Hamilton Leithauser (1.96%)
  • Walter Martin (1.96%)
  • Paul Maroon (1.96%)
  • Peter Matthew Bauer (1.96%)
  • Peter Bauer (2) (1.96%)
  • Peter Bauer (0.49%)
  • Flashy Python (0.49%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
THE WALKMEN 75.49%
Influence Score
i
8.15% of network
(1.27)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.15%)
  • THE WALKMEN (10.37%)
  • Luke Temple (8.15%)
  • Hamilton Leithauser (8.15%)
  • Walter Martin (8.15%)
  • Peter Bauer (8.15%)
  • Paul Maroon (8.15%)
  • Muzz (8.15%)
  • Matt Barrick (8.15%)
  • Flashy Python (8.15%)
  • Peter Matthew Bauer (8.15%)
  • Peter Bauer (2) (8.15%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 11 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 154 [THE WALKMEN] *
                            9 [Luke Temple] *
                            4 [Hamilton Leithauser] *
                            4 [Walter Martin] *
                            1 [Peter Bauer] *
                            4 [Paul Maroon] *
                            9 [Muzz] *
                            9 [Matt Barrick] *
                            1 [Flashy Python] *
                            4 [Peter Matthew Bauer] *
                            4 [Peter Bauer (2)]
                           )

                         = 114.96M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.27 [THE WALKMEN] *
                            1 [Luke Temple] *
                            1 [Hamilton Leithauser] *
                            1 [Walter Martin] *
                            1 [Peter Bauer] *
                            1 [Paul Maroon] *
                            1 [Muzz] *
                            1 [Matt Barrick] *
                            1 [Flashy Python] *
                            1 [Peter Matthew Bauer] *
                            1 [Peter Bauer (2)]
                           )

                         = 1.27
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 11 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.49% (114.96M overall)
  • This Post (0.49%)
  • Luke Temple (4.41%)
  • Muzz (4.41%)
  • Matt Barrick (4.41%)
  • Hamilton Leithauser (1.96%)
  • Walter Martin (1.96%)
  • Paul Maroon (1.96%)
  • Peter Matthew Bauer (1.96%)
  • Peter Bauer (2) (1.96%)
  • Peter Bauer (0.49%)
  • Flashy Python (0.49%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
THE WALKMEN 75.49%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.15% (1.27 overall)
  • This Post (8.15%)
  • THE WALKMEN (10.37%)
  • Luke Temple (8.15%)
  • Hamilton Leithauser (8.15%)
  • Walter Martin (8.15%)
  • Peter Bauer (8.15%)
  • Paul Maroon (8.15%)
  • Muzz (8.15%)
  • Matt Barrick (8.15%)
  • Flashy Python (8.15%)
  • Peter Matthew Bauer (8.15%)
  • Peter Bauer (2) (8.15%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
THE WALKMEN ↗
Str: 154Inf: 1.27
Luke Temple ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Hamilton Leithauser ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Walter Martin ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Peter Bauer ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Maroon ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Muzz ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Matt Barrick ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Flashy Python ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Peter Matthew Bauer ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Peter Bauer (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Peter Bauer (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Peter Matthew Bauer ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Flashy Python ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Matt Barrick ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Muzz ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Paul Maroon ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Peter Bauer ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Walter Martin ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Hamilton Leithauser ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Luke Temple ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
THE WALKMEN ↗
Str: 154Inf: 1.27

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
the walkmen
Inbound Posts (1)
THE WALKMEN
Last calculated: Jun 26, 1:11 PM
29

Related Content

No related content found.