Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Gunnar OlsenGunnar Olsen (2)Jakob Lykkebo
Iron Fire
Sigurd JÃ ̧hnk JensenJ.J. (29)Martin Lund (3)Steve Mason (24)Fritz Wagner (3)Martin Steene

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Kirk Backarach

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Iron Fire
    Iron Fire band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Fritz Wagner (3)
  • Gunnar Olsen
  • Gunnar Olsen (2)
  • J.J. (29)
  • Jakob Lykkebo
  • Martin Lund (3)
  • Martin Steene
  • Sigurd JÃ ̧hnk Jensen
  • Steve Mason (24)

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.83% of network
(3.6K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.83%)
  • Gunnar Olsen (7.44%)
  • Steve Mason (24) (3.31%)
  • Jakob Lykkebo (0.83%)
  • Martin Steene (0.83%)
  • Fritz Wagner (3) (0.83%)
  • Gunnar Olsen (2) (0.83%)
  • J.J. (29) (0.83%)
  • Martin Lund (3) (0.83%)
  • Sigurd JÃ ̧hnk Jensen (0.83%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Iron Fire 82.64%
Influence Score
i
9.09% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Iron Fire (9.09%)
  • Gunnar Olsen (9.09%)
  • Jakob Lykkebo (9.09%)
  • Martin Steene (9.09%)
  • Steve Mason (24) (9.09%)
  • Fritz Wagner (3) (9.09%)
  • Gunnar Olsen (2) (9.09%)
  • J.J. (29) (9.09%)
  • Martin Lund (3) (9.09%)
  • Sigurd JÃ ̧hnk Jensen (9.09%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 100 [Iron Fire] *
                            9 [Gunnar Olsen] *
                            1 [Jakob Lykkebo] *
                            1 [Martin Steene] *
                            4 [Steve Mason (24)] *
                            1 [Fritz Wagner (3)] *
                            1 [Gunnar Olsen (2)] *
                            1 [J.J. (29)] *
                            1 [Martin Lund (3)] *
                            1 [Sigurd JÃ ̧hnk Jensen]
                           )

                         = 3.6K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Iron Fire] *
                            1 [Gunnar Olsen] *
                            1 [Jakob Lykkebo] *
                            1 [Martin Steene] *
                            1 [Steve Mason (24)] *
                            1 [Fritz Wagner (3)] *
                            1 [Gunnar Olsen (2)] *
                            1 [J.J. (29)] *
                            1 [Martin Lund (3)] *
                            1 [Sigurd JÃ ̧hnk Jensen]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.83% (3.6K overall)
  • This Post (0.83%)
  • Gunnar Olsen (7.44%)
  • Steve Mason (24) (3.31%)
  • Jakob Lykkebo (0.83%)
  • Martin Steene (0.83%)
  • Fritz Wagner (3) (0.83%)
  • Gunnar Olsen (2) (0.83%)
  • J.J. (29) (0.83%)
  • Martin Lund (3) (0.83%)
  • Sigurd JÃ ̧hnk Jensen (0.83%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Iron Fire 82.64%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.09% (1 overall)
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Iron Fire (9.09%)
  • Gunnar Olsen (9.09%)
  • Jakob Lykkebo (9.09%)
  • Martin Steene (9.09%)
  • Steve Mason (24) (9.09%)
  • Fritz Wagner (3) (9.09%)
  • Gunnar Olsen (2) (9.09%)
  • J.J. (29) (9.09%)
  • Martin Lund (3) (9.09%)
  • Sigurd JÃ ̧hnk Jensen (9.09%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Iron Fire ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Gunnar Olsen ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Jakob Lykkebo ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Martin Steene ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Mason (24) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Fritz Wagner (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gunnar Olsen (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
J.J. (29) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Martin Lund (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sigurd JÃ ̧hnk Jensen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Sigurd JÃ ̧hnk Jensen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Martin Lund (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
J.J. (29) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gunnar Olsen (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Fritz Wagner (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Mason (24) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Martin Steene ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jakob Lykkebo ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gunnar Olsen ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Iron Fire ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Iron Fire
Inbound Posts (1)
Iron Fire
Last calculated: Jun 24, 9:43 AM
24

Related Content

No related content found.