Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Pete ShoreOwen McMahonCherubsEd HallLyman HardyBrent PragerGary Chester (3)Andrew B. ColvinLarry Strub

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 7 days ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Whitley (3)

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Cherubs
  • Ed Hall

Connected Musicians

  • Andrew B. Colvin
  • Brent Prager
  • Gary Chester (3)
  • Larry Strub
  • Lyman Hardy
  • Owen McMahon
  • Pete Shore

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
5.97% of network
(25.6K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (5.97%)
  • Brent Prager (1.49%)
  • Owen McMahon (1.49%)
  • Andrew B. Colvin (1.49%)
  • Gary Chester (3) (1.49%)
  • Larry Strub (1.49%)
  • Lyman Hardy (1.49%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Ed Hall 37.31%Cherubs 23.88%Pete Shore 23.88%
Influence Score
i
10.00% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Cherubs (10.00%)
  • Pete Shore (10.00%)
  • Brent Prager (10.00%)
  • Owen McMahon (10.00%)
  • Ed Hall (10.00%)
  • Andrew B. Colvin (10.00%)
  • Gary Chester (3) (10.00%)
  • Larry Strub (10.00%)
  • Lyman Hardy (10.00%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 16 [Cherubs] *
                            16 [Pete Shore] *
                            1 [Brent Prager] *
                            1 [Owen McMahon] *
                            25 [Ed Hall] *
                            1 [Andrew B. Colvin] *
                            1 [Gary Chester (3)] *
                            1 [Larry Strub] *
                            1 [Lyman Hardy]
                           )

                         = 25.6K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Cherubs] *
                            1 [Pete Shore] *
                            1 [Brent Prager] *
                            1 [Owen McMahon] *
                            1 [Ed Hall] *
                            1 [Andrew B. Colvin] *
                            1 [Gary Chester (3)] *
                            1 [Larry Strub] *
                            1 [Lyman Hardy]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
5.97% (25.6K overall)
  • This Post (5.97%)
  • Brent Prager (1.49%)
  • Owen McMahon (1.49%)
  • Andrew B. Colvin (1.49%)
  • Gary Chester (3) (1.49%)
  • Larry Strub (1.49%)
  • Lyman Hardy (1.49%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Ed Hall 37.31%Cherubs 23.88%Pete Shore 23.88%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.00% (1 overall)
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Cherubs (10.00%)
  • Pete Shore (10.00%)
  • Brent Prager (10.00%)
  • Owen McMahon (10.00%)
  • Ed Hall (10.00%)
  • Andrew B. Colvin (10.00%)
  • Gary Chester (3) (10.00%)
  • Larry Strub (10.00%)
  • Lyman Hardy (10.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Cherubs ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Pete Shore ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Brent Prager ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Owen McMahon ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ed Hall ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Andrew B. Colvin ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gary Chester (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Larry Strub ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lyman Hardy ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Lyman Hardy ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Larry Strub ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gary Chester (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Andrew B. Colvin ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ed Hall ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Owen McMahon ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brent Prager ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pete Shore ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Cherubs ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Cherubs
Ed Hall
Inbound Posts (2)
Cherubs
Ed Hall
Last calculated: Sep 7, 9:51 AM
31

Related Content

No related content found.