Network Profile
View Network Math
Overall Strength
1.18%
of network18 )
Direct Connections
6
Node & Network Strength Details
×
How is this calculated? The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the website.
Every tag forms a network link. The pie charts below show each connected post's base strength (PV) and influence (IV) as a share of this post's direct neighbourhood.
Outbound
3
Tags on post
Inbound
3
Posts tagging this
Base Node Strength
9
Base Node Influence
1
Connected Nodes
18
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.18%
(2.98 × 1018 overall)
This Post (1.18%) Tim Reeves (1.18%) Scott Morgan (0.52%) Andrew Frost (0.52%) Laurent Ciron (0.52%) Paul Grace Smith (0.52%) Ries Doms (0.52%) Theo Brouwer (0.52%) Tony Leeuwenburgh (0.52%) Alister Spence (0.52%) Artie Sledge (0.52%) Eamon Dilworth (0.52%) Mark Dawson (2) (0.52%) Paul Larsen (2) (0.52%) Peter Oxley (0.52%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart) Nicke Andersson 42.46% Ed Kuepper 22.15% The Aints 13.11% The Hydromatics 13.11%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
This Post (5.26%) Ed Kuepper (5.26%) The Aints (5.26%) Nicke Andersson (5.26%) Scott Morgan (5.26%) The Hydromatics (5.26%) Tim Reeves (5.26%) Andrew Frost (5.26%) Laurent Ciron (5.26%) Paul Grace Smith (5.26%) Ries Doms (5.26%) Theo Brouwer (5.26%) Tony Leeuwenburgh (5.26%) Alister Spence (5.26%) Artie Sledge (5.26%) Eamon Dilworth (5.26%) Mark Dawson (2) (5.26%) Paul Larsen (2) (5.26%) Peter Oxley (5.26%)
Connected Network (How neighbours affect this node)
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)
Last calculated math cycle: May 4, 1:53 AM
Close Report
Analyzing Network Connections...
Most Relevant
Most Integral
Depth: 1 Level
Depth: 2 Levels
Depth: 3 Levels
Depth: 4 Levels
Depth: 5 Levels
Depth: 6 Levels
Depth: 7 Levels
👁️ 35 ViewsRelated Content No related content found.