How is this calculated?
The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.
// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2
// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1
// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 26 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
= 4 *
( 289 [Nominon] *
4 [David Svartz] *
4 [Alexander Lyrbo] *
1 [Anders Malmström] *
1 [Juha Sulasalmi] *
4 [Perra Karlsson] *
9 [Joel Andersson] *
4 [Lenny Blade] *
4 [Emil Dragutinovic] *
4 [Jonas Mattsson] *
1 [Daniel Garptoft] *
1 [Henke Skoog] *
1 [Niklas Holstenson] *
1 [Tobbe Hellman] *
9 [Kræn Meier] *
1 [Christian Strömblad] *
1 [Pär Gustafsson (2)] *
81 [Purtenance] *
1 [Aabeg Gautam] *
1 [Harri Salo] *
1 [Pasi (9)] *
1 [Simo Rouvinen] *
1 [Tero Aalto] *
4 [Toni Honkala] *
1 [Ville Koskela (2)] *
1 [Ville Nokelainen]
)
= 124.26B
Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
= 1 *
( 1 [Nominon] *
1 [David Svartz] *
1 [Alexander Lyrbo] *
1 [Anders Malmström] *
1 [Juha Sulasalmi] *
1 [Perra Karlsson] *
1 [Joel Andersson] *
1 [Lenny Blade] *
1 [Emil Dragutinovic] *
1 [Jonas Mattsson] *
1 [Daniel Garptoft] *
1 [Henke Skoog] *
1 [Niklas Holstenson] *
1 [Tobbe Hellman] *
1 [Kræn Meier] *
1 [Christian Strömblad] *
1 [Pär Gustafsson (2)] *
1 [Purtenance] *
1 [Aabeg Gautam] *
1 [Harri Salo] *
1 [Pasi (9)] *
1 [Simo Rouvinen] *
1 [Tero Aalto] *
1 [Toni Honkala] *
1 [Ville Koskela (2)] *
1 [Ville Nokelainen]
)
= 1
Outbound
2
Tags on post
Inbound
2
Posts tagging this
Connections
26
Total nodes
Base Node Strength
4
Base Node Influence
1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)Nominon 66.44%Purtenance 18.62%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Connected Network Hierarchy
Sort list by:
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)