Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Joseph Karnes
James King
Fitz and the Tantrums
Noelle ScaggsMichael FitzpatrickEthan PhillipsMichael Fitzpatrick (2)Jeremy RuzumnaScott Ellis

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 6 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

John Wicks

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Fitz and the Tantrums
    Fitz and the Tantrums band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Ethan Phillips
  • James King
  • Jeremy Ruzumna
  • Joseph Karnes
    Joseph Karnes band photo
  • Michael Fitzpatrick (2)
  • Noelle Scaggs
  • Scott Ellis

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.70% of network
(186.6K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.70%)
  • Scott Ellis (2.80%)
  • James King (0.70%)
  • Jeremy Ruzumna (0.70%)
  • Michael Fitzpatrick (0.70%)
  • Michael Fitzpatrick (2) (0.70%)
  • Noelle Scaggs (0.70%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Fitz and the Tantrums 56.64%Ethan Phillips 25.17%Joseph Karnes 11.19%
Influence Score
i
10.00% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Fitz and the Tantrums (10.00%)
  • Joseph Karnes (10.00%)
  • James King (10.00%)
  • Ethan Phillips (10.00%)
  • Jeremy Ruzumna (10.00%)
  • Michael Fitzpatrick (10.00%)
  • Michael Fitzpatrick (2) (10.00%)
  • Noelle Scaggs (10.00%)
  • Scott Ellis (10.00%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 81 [Fitz and the Tantrums] *
                            16 [Joseph Karnes] *
                            1 [James King] *
                            36 [Ethan Phillips] *
                            1 [Jeremy Ruzumna] *
                            1 [Michael Fitzpatrick] *
                            1 [Michael Fitzpatrick (2)] *
                            1 [Noelle Scaggs] *
                            4 [Scott Ellis]
                           )

                         = 186.6K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Fitz and the Tantrums] *
                            1 [Joseph Karnes] *
                            1 [James King] *
                            1 [Ethan Phillips] *
                            1 [Jeremy Ruzumna] *
                            1 [Michael Fitzpatrick] *
                            1 [Michael Fitzpatrick (2)] *
                            1 [Noelle Scaggs] *
                            1 [Scott Ellis]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.70% (186.6K overall)
  • This Post (0.70%)
  • Scott Ellis (2.80%)
  • James King (0.70%)
  • Jeremy Ruzumna (0.70%)
  • Michael Fitzpatrick (0.70%)
  • Michael Fitzpatrick (2) (0.70%)
  • Noelle Scaggs (0.70%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Fitz and the Tantrums 56.64%Ethan Phillips 25.17%Joseph Karnes 11.19%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.00% (1 overall)
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Fitz and the Tantrums (10.00%)
  • Joseph Karnes (10.00%)
  • James King (10.00%)
  • Ethan Phillips (10.00%)
  • Jeremy Ruzumna (10.00%)
  • Michael Fitzpatrick (10.00%)
  • Michael Fitzpatrick (2) (10.00%)
  • Noelle Scaggs (10.00%)
  • Scott Ellis (10.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Fitz and the Tantrums ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Joseph Karnes ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
James King ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ethan Phillips ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Jeremy Ruzumna ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Fitzpatrick ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Fitzpatrick (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Noelle Scaggs ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Scott Ellis ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Scott Ellis ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Noelle Scaggs ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Fitzpatrick (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Fitzpatrick ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jeremy Ruzumna ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ethan Phillips ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
James King ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Joseph Karnes ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Fitz and the Tantrums ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Fitz and the Tantrums
Inbound Posts (1)
Fitz and the Tantrums
Last calculated: Jun 12, 9:22 PM
56

Related Content

Figures

  • Michael Fitzpatrick