Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Joe Haggerty
The Effigies
Tom Woods (2)Earl LetiecqChris BjorklundSteve EconomouRobert O’Connor (2)Robert McNaughtonPaul Zamost

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 6 hours ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 16 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

John Kezdy

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • The Effigies
    The Effigies band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Chris Bjorklund
  • Earl Letiecq
  • Joe Haggerty
  • Paul Zamost
  • Robert McNaughton
  • Robert O’Connor (2)
  • Steve Economou
  • Tom Woods (2)

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.04% of network
(1.3K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.04%)
  • Chris Bjorklund (4.17%)
  • Joe Haggerty (4.17%)
  • Earl Letiecq (1.04%)
  • Paul Zamost (1.04%)
  • Robert McNaughton (1.04%)
  • Steve Economou (1.04%)
  • Tom Woods (2) (1.04%)
  • Robert O'Connor (2) (1.04%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Effigies 84.38%
Influence Score
i
10.00% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • The Effigies (10.00%)
  • Earl Letiecq (10.00%)
  • Paul Zamost (10.00%)
  • Chris Bjorklund (10.00%)
  • Joe Haggerty (10.00%)
  • Robert McNaughton (10.00%)
  • Steve Economou (10.00%)
  • Tom Woods (2) (10.00%)
  • Robert O'Connor (2) (10.00%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 81 [The Effigies] *
                            1 [Earl Letiecq] *
                            1 [Paul Zamost] *
                            4 [Chris Bjorklund] *
                            4 [Joe Haggerty] *
                            1 [Robert McNaughton] *
                            1 [Steve Economou] *
                            1 [Tom Woods (2)] *
                            1 [Robert O'Connor (2)]
                           )

                         = 1.3K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [The Effigies] *
                            1 [Earl Letiecq] *
                            1 [Paul Zamost] *
                            1 [Chris Bjorklund] *
                            1 [Joe Haggerty] *
                            1 [Robert McNaughton] *
                            1 [Steve Economou] *
                            1 [Tom Woods (2)] *
                            1 [Robert O'Connor (2)]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.04% (1.3K overall)
  • This Post (1.04%)
  • Chris Bjorklund (4.17%)
  • Joe Haggerty (4.17%)
  • Earl Letiecq (1.04%)
  • Paul Zamost (1.04%)
  • Robert McNaughton (1.04%)
  • Steve Economou (1.04%)
  • Tom Woods (2) (1.04%)
  • Robert O'Connor (2) (1.04%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Effigies 84.38%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.00% (1 overall)
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • The Effigies (10.00%)
  • Earl Letiecq (10.00%)
  • Paul Zamost (10.00%)
  • Chris Bjorklund (10.00%)
  • Joe Haggerty (10.00%)
  • Robert McNaughton (10.00%)
  • Steve Economou (10.00%)
  • Tom Woods (2) (10.00%)
  • Robert O'Connor (2) (10.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
The Effigies ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Earl Letiecq ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Zamost ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Chris Bjorklund ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Joe Haggerty ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Robert McNaughton ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Economou ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tom Woods (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Robert O'Connor (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Robert O'Connor (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tom Woods (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Economou ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Robert McNaughton ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Joe Haggerty ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Chris Bjorklund ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Paul Zamost ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Earl Letiecq ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Effigies ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
the effigies
Inbound Posts (1)
The Effigies
Last calculated: Jun 29, 9:10 PM
20

Related Content

No related content found.