Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Alannah Currie
Thompson Twins
John RoogMichael White (17)Matthew SeligmanTom BaileyChris Bell (3)Ced SharpleyPeter Dodd

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 15 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Joe Leeway

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Thompson Twins
    Thompson Twins band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Alannah Currie
  • Ced Sharpley
  • Chris Bell (3)
  • John Roog
  • Matthew Seligman
  • Michael White (17)
  • Peter Dodd

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.90% of network
(20.7K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.90%)
  • Matthew Seligman (3.60%)
  • Ced Sharpley (3.60%)
  • Tom Bailey (0.90%)
  • Chris Bell (3) (0.90%)
  • John Roog (0.90%)
  • Michael White (17) (0.90%)
  • Peter Dodd (0.90%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Thompson Twins 72.97%Alannah Currie 14.41%
Influence Score
i
10.00% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Thompson Twins (10.00%)
  • Alannah Currie (10.00%)
  • Tom Bailey (10.00%)
  • Matthew Seligman (10.00%)
  • Ced Sharpley (10.00%)
  • Chris Bell (3) (10.00%)
  • John Roog (10.00%)
  • Michael White (17) (10.00%)
  • Peter Dodd (10.00%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 81 [Thompson Twins] *
                            16 [Alannah Currie] *
                            1 [Tom Bailey] *
                            4 [Matthew Seligman] *
                            4 [Ced Sharpley] *
                            1 [Chris Bell (3)] *
                            1 [John Roog] *
                            1 [Michael White (17)] *
                            1 [Peter Dodd]
                           )

                         = 20.7K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Thompson Twins] *
                            1 [Alannah Currie] *
                            1 [Tom Bailey] *
                            1 [Matthew Seligman] *
                            1 [Ced Sharpley] *
                            1 [Chris Bell (3)] *
                            1 [John Roog] *
                            1 [Michael White (17)] *
                            1 [Peter Dodd]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.90% (20.7K overall)
  • This Post (0.90%)
  • Matthew Seligman (3.60%)
  • Ced Sharpley (3.60%)
  • Tom Bailey (0.90%)
  • Chris Bell (3) (0.90%)
  • John Roog (0.90%)
  • Michael White (17) (0.90%)
  • Peter Dodd (0.90%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Thompson Twins 72.97%Alannah Currie 14.41%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.00% (1 overall)
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Thompson Twins (10.00%)
  • Alannah Currie (10.00%)
  • Tom Bailey (10.00%)
  • Matthew Seligman (10.00%)
  • Ced Sharpley (10.00%)
  • Chris Bell (3) (10.00%)
  • John Roog (10.00%)
  • Michael White (17) (10.00%)
  • Peter Dodd (10.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Thompson Twins ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Alannah Currie ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Tom Bailey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Matthew Seligman ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Ced Sharpley ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Chris Bell (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John Roog ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael White (17) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Peter Dodd ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Peter Dodd ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael White (17) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John Roog ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Chris Bell (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ced Sharpley ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Matthew Seligman ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Tom Bailey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Alannah Currie ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Thompson Twins ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Thompson Twins
Inbound Posts (1)
Thompson Twins
Last calculated: Jun 23, 9:21 PM
41

Related Content

Figures

  • Tom Bailey