Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Den Perdicou
leif vollebekk
Nicholas DingleyPhil LanghamThe DarkJim KaneAndy RiffPunchbuggyAssociates Of Michael FeuerstackOwl Mountain Radar

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Jim Bryson

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Associates Of Michael Feuerstack
  • Owl Mountain Radar
  • Punchbuggy
  • The Dark

Connected Musicians

  • Andy Riff
  • Den Perdicou
  • Jim Kane
  • leif vollebekk
    leif vollebekk band photo
  • Nicholas Dingley
  • Phil Langham

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
23.88% of network
(9.2K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (23.88%)
  • Nicholas Dingley (5.97%)
  • Associates Of Michael Feuerstack (5.97%)
  • Phil Langham (1.49%)
  • Jim Kane (1.49%)
  • Den Perdicou (1.49%)
  • Andy Riff (1.49%)
  • leif vollebekk (1.49%)
  • Owl Mountain Radar (1.49%)
  • Punchbuggy (1.49%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Dark 53.73%
Influence Score
i
9.09% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • The Dark (9.09%)
  • Phil Langham (9.09%)
  • Nicholas Dingley (9.09%)
  • Jim Kane (9.09%)
  • Den Perdicou (9.09%)
  • Andy Riff (9.09%)
  • leif vollebekk (9.09%)
  • Associates Of Michael Feuerstack (9.09%)
  • Owl Mountain Radar (9.09%)
  • Punchbuggy (9.09%)
Direct Connections 8

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 4) = 4
$outbound = max(1, 4) = 4

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 4 * 4 = 16
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 4 / 4 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 16 *
                           ( 36 [The Dark] *
                            1 [Phil Langham] *
                            4 [Nicholas Dingley] *
                            1 [Jim Kane] *
                            1 [Den Perdicou] *
                            1 [Andy Riff] *
                            1 [leif vollebekk] *
                            4 [Associates Of Michael Feuerstack] *
                            1 [Owl Mountain Radar] *
                            1 [Punchbuggy]
                           )

                         = 9.2K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [The Dark] *
                            1 [Phil Langham] *
                            1 [Nicholas Dingley] *
                            1 [Jim Kane] *
                            1 [Den Perdicou] *
                            1 [Andy Riff] *
                            1 [leif vollebekk] *
                            1 [Associates Of Michael Feuerstack] *
                            1 [Owl Mountain Radar] *
                            1 [Punchbuggy]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 4 Tags on post
Inbound 4 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 16
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
23.88% (9.2K overall)
  • This Post (23.88%)
  • Nicholas Dingley (5.97%)
  • Associates Of Michael Feuerstack (5.97%)
  • Phil Langham (1.49%)
  • Jim Kane (1.49%)
  • Den Perdicou (1.49%)
  • Andy Riff (1.49%)
  • leif vollebekk (1.49%)
  • Owl Mountain Radar (1.49%)
  • Punchbuggy (1.49%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Dark 53.73%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.09% (1 overall)
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • The Dark (9.09%)
  • Phil Langham (9.09%)
  • Nicholas Dingley (9.09%)
  • Jim Kane (9.09%)
  • Den Perdicou (9.09%)
  • Andy Riff (9.09%)
  • leif vollebekk (9.09%)
  • Associates Of Michael Feuerstack (9.09%)
  • Owl Mountain Radar (9.09%)
  • Punchbuggy (9.09%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
The Dark ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Phil Langham ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Nicholas Dingley ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Jim Kane ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Den Perdicou ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Andy Riff ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
leif vollebekk ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Associates Of Michael Feuerstack ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Owl Mountain Radar ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Punchbuggy ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Punchbuggy ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Owl Mountain Radar ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Associates Of Michael Feuerstack ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
leif vollebekk ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Andy Riff ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Den Perdicou ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jim Kane ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Nicholas Dingley ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Phil Langham ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Dark ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (4)
Associates Of Michael Feuerstack
Owl Mountain Radar
Punchbuggy
The Dark
Inbound Posts (4)
The Dark
Associates Of Michael Feuerstack
Owl Mountain Radar
Punchbuggy
Last calculated: Jun 27, 1:12 AM
39

Related Content

No related content found.