Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Rob WatsonSteve Baxter (6)terry taylor
Rich Mullins
Tim ChandlerMark Cook (2)Greg FleschDaniel AmosAlex MacDougallMarty Dieckmeyer

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Jerry Chamberlain

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Daniel Amos

Connected Musicians

  • Alex MacDougall
  • Ed McTaggart
  • Greg Flesch
  • Mark Cook (2)
  • Marty Dieckmeyer
  • Rich Mullins
    Rich Mullins band photo
  • Rob Watson
  • Steve Baxter (6)
  • terry taylor
  • Tim Chandler

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.52% of network
(2.72M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.52%)
  • Rob Watson (4.71%)
  • terry taylor (2.09%)
  • Alex MacDougall (0.52%)
  • Ed McTaggart (0.52%)
  • Greg Flesch (0.52%)
  • Mark Cook (2) (0.52%)
  • Marty Dieckmeyer (0.52%)
  • Steve Baxter (6) (0.52%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Daniel Amos 63.35%Rich Mullins 13.09%Tim Chandler 13.09%
Influence Score
i
8.33% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Rich Mullins (8.33%)
  • terry taylor (8.33%)
  • Daniel Amos (8.33%)
  • Tim Chandler (8.33%)
  • Rob Watson (8.33%)
  • Alex MacDougall (8.33%)
  • Ed McTaggart (8.33%)
  • Greg Flesch (8.33%)
  • Mark Cook (2) (8.33%)
  • Marty Dieckmeyer (8.33%)
  • Steve Baxter (6) (8.33%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 11 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 25 [Rich Mullins] *
                            4 [terry taylor] *
                            121 [Daniel Amos] *
                            25 [Tim Chandler] *
                            9 [Rob Watson] *
                            1 [Alex MacDougall] *
                            1 [Ed McTaggart] *
                            1 [Greg Flesch] *
                            1 [Mark Cook (2)] *
                            1 [Marty Dieckmeyer] *
                            1 [Steve Baxter (6)]
                           )

                         = 2.72M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Rich Mullins] *
                            1 [terry taylor] *
                            1 [Daniel Amos] *
                            1 [Tim Chandler] *
                            1 [Rob Watson] *
                            1 [Alex MacDougall] *
                            1 [Ed McTaggart] *
                            1 [Greg Flesch] *
                            1 [Mark Cook (2)] *
                            1 [Marty Dieckmeyer] *
                            1 [Steve Baxter (6)]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 11 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.52% (2.72M overall)
  • This Post (0.52%)
  • Rob Watson (4.71%)
  • terry taylor (2.09%)
  • Alex MacDougall (0.52%)
  • Ed McTaggart (0.52%)
  • Greg Flesch (0.52%)
  • Mark Cook (2) (0.52%)
  • Marty Dieckmeyer (0.52%)
  • Steve Baxter (6) (0.52%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Daniel Amos 63.35%Rich Mullins 13.09%Tim Chandler 13.09%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.33% (1 overall)
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Rich Mullins (8.33%)
  • terry taylor (8.33%)
  • Daniel Amos (8.33%)
  • Tim Chandler (8.33%)
  • Rob Watson (8.33%)
  • Alex MacDougall (8.33%)
  • Ed McTaggart (8.33%)
  • Greg Flesch (8.33%)
  • Mark Cook (2) (8.33%)
  • Marty Dieckmeyer (8.33%)
  • Steve Baxter (6) (8.33%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Rich Mullins ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
terry taylor ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Daniel Amos ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Tim Chandler ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Rob Watson ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Alex MacDougall ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ed McTaggart ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Greg Flesch ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mark Cook (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Marty Dieckmeyer ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Baxter (6) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Steve Baxter (6) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Marty Dieckmeyer ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mark Cook (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Greg Flesch ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ed McTaggart ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Alex MacDougall ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Rob Watson ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Tim Chandler ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Daniel Amos ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
terry taylor ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Rich Mullins ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Daniel Amos
Inbound Posts (1)
Daniel Amos
Last calculated: Jun 26, 11:47 AM
26

Related Content

No related content found.