Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

J.E. Garnett
Billy Burton (2)Billy Jones (25)Neill CalabroThe Swimming Pool Q’sRobert SchmidAnne Richmond BostonBob Elsey

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Jeff Calder

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • The Swimming Pool Q’s

Connected Musicians

  • Anne Richmond Boston
  • Billy Burton (2)
  • Billy Jones (25)
  • Bob Elsey
  • J.E. Garnett
    J.E. Garnett band photo
  • Neill Calabro
  • Robert Schmid

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.33% of network
(256)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.33%)
  • J.E. Garnett (5.33%)
  • Anne Richmond Boston (1.33%)
  • Billy Burton (2) (1.33%)
  • Billy Jones (25) (1.33%)
  • Bob Elsey (1.33%)
  • Neill Calabro (1.33%)
  • Robert Schmid (1.33%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Swimming Pool Q's 85.33%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • The Swimming Pool Q's (11.11%)
  • Anne Richmond Boston (11.11%)
  • Billy Burton (2) (11.11%)
  • Billy Jones (25) (11.11%)
  • Bob Elsey (11.11%)
  • J.E. Garnett (11.11%)
  • Neill Calabro (11.11%)
  • Robert Schmid (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [The Swimming Pool Q's] *
                            1 [Anne Richmond Boston] *
                            1 [Billy Burton (2)] *
                            1 [Billy Jones (25)] *
                            1 [Bob Elsey] *
                            4 [J.E. Garnett] *
                            1 [Neill Calabro] *
                            1 [Robert Schmid]
                           )

                         = 256

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [The Swimming Pool Q's] *
                            1 [Anne Richmond Boston] *
                            1 [Billy Burton (2)] *
                            1 [Billy Jones (25)] *
                            1 [Bob Elsey] *
                            1 [J.E. Garnett] *
                            1 [Neill Calabro] *
                            1 [Robert Schmid]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.33% (256 overall)
  • This Post (1.33%)
  • J.E. Garnett (5.33%)
  • Anne Richmond Boston (1.33%)
  • Billy Burton (2) (1.33%)
  • Billy Jones (25) (1.33%)
  • Bob Elsey (1.33%)
  • Neill Calabro (1.33%)
  • Robert Schmid (1.33%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Swimming Pool Q's 85.33%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • The Swimming Pool Q's (11.11%)
  • Anne Richmond Boston (11.11%)
  • Billy Burton (2) (11.11%)
  • Billy Jones (25) (11.11%)
  • Bob Elsey (11.11%)
  • J.E. Garnett (11.11%)
  • Neill Calabro (11.11%)
  • Robert Schmid (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
The Swimming Pool Q's ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Anne Richmond Boston ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Billy Burton (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Billy Jones (25) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Bob Elsey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
J.E. Garnett ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Neill Calabro ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Robert Schmid ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Robert Schmid ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Neill Calabro ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
J.E. Garnett ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Bob Elsey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Billy Jones (25) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Billy Burton (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Anne Richmond Boston ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Swimming Pool Q's ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
The Swimming Pool Q's
Inbound Posts (1)
The Swimming Pool Q's
Last calculated: Jun 24, 10:20 AM
23

Related Content

No related content found.