Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Shane Gough
Blue Moose
TOMI MOLNARPHILIP JOYCETONY WARDKEELAN KELLYKARMSWE WERE GIANTS

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

JASON MALENEY

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Blue Moose
    Blue Moose band photo
  • KARMS
  • WE WERE GIANTS

Connected Musicians

  • KEELAN KELLY
  • PHILIP JOYCE
  • Shane Gough
    Shane Gough band photo
  • TOMI MOLNAR
  • TONY WARD

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
5.96% of network
(32.4K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (5.96%)
  • TOMI MOLNAR (0.66%)
  • TONY WARD (0.66%)
  • PHILIP JOYCE (0.66%)
  • KEELAN KELLY (0.66%)
  • WE WERE GIANTS (0.66%)
  • KARMS (0.66%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Shane Gough 66.23%Blue Moose 23.84%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Blue Moose (11.11%)
  • Shane Gough (11.11%)
  • TOMI MOLNAR (11.11%)
  • TONY WARD (11.11%)
  • PHILIP JOYCE (11.11%)
  • KEELAN KELLY (11.11%)
  • WE WERE GIANTS (11.11%)
  • KARMS (11.11%)
Direct Connections 6

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 3) = 3
$outbound = max(1, 3) = 3

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 3 * 3 = 9
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 3 / 3 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 9 *
                           ( 36 [Blue Moose] *
                            100 [Shane Gough] *
                            1 [TOMI MOLNAR] *
                            1 [TONY WARD] *
                            1 [PHILIP JOYCE] *
                            1 [KEELAN KELLY] *
                            1 [WE WERE GIANTS] *
                            1 [KARMS]
                           )

                         = 32.4K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Blue Moose] *
                            1 [Shane Gough] *
                            1 [TOMI MOLNAR] *
                            1 [TONY WARD] *
                            1 [PHILIP JOYCE] *
                            1 [KEELAN KELLY] *
                            1 [WE WERE GIANTS] *
                            1 [KARMS]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 3 Tags on post
Inbound 3 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 9
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
5.96% (32.4K overall)
  • This Post (5.96%)
  • TOMI MOLNAR (0.66%)
  • TONY WARD (0.66%)
  • PHILIP JOYCE (0.66%)
  • KEELAN KELLY (0.66%)
  • WE WERE GIANTS (0.66%)
  • KARMS (0.66%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Shane Gough 66.23%Blue Moose 23.84%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Blue Moose (11.11%)
  • Shane Gough (11.11%)
  • TOMI MOLNAR (11.11%)
  • TONY WARD (11.11%)
  • PHILIP JOYCE (11.11%)
  • KEELAN KELLY (11.11%)
  • WE WERE GIANTS (11.11%)
  • KARMS (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Blue Moose ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Shane Gough ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
TOMI MOLNAR ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
TONY WARD ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
PHILIP JOYCE ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
KEELAN KELLY ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
WE WERE GIANTS ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
KARMS ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
KARMS ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
WE WERE GIANTS ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
KEELAN KELLY ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
PHILIP JOYCE ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
TONY WARD ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
TOMI MOLNAR ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Shane Gough ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Blue Moose ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (3)
Blue Moose
KARMS
WE WERE GIANTS
Inbound Posts (3)
Blue Moose
KARMS
WE WERE GIANTS
Last calculated: Aug 30, 4:21 PM
55

Related Content

No related content found.