Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Tony Fennell
Big Noise (4)Paul Johnson (21)Linton LevyTony FenelleTony LahiffeTony Jones (7)Gary Thompson (3)

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Huw Lucas

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Big Noise (4)

Connected Musicians

  • Gary Thompson (3)
  • Linton Levy
  • Paul Johnson (21)
  • Tony Fenelle
  • Tony Fennell
    Tony Fennell band photo
  • Tony Jones (7)
  • Tony Lahiffe

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.14% of network
(5.2K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.14%)
  • Tony Fennell (10.23%)
  • Tony Fenelle (10.23%)
  • Gary Thompson (3) (1.14%)
  • Linton Levy (1.14%)
  • Paul Johnson (21) (1.14%)
  • Tony Jones (7) (1.14%)
  • Tony Lahiffe (1.14%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Big Noise (4) 72.73%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Tony Fennell (11.11%)
  • Tony Fenelle (11.11%)
  • Big Noise (4) (11.11%)
  • Gary Thompson (3) (11.11%)
  • Linton Levy (11.11%)
  • Paul Johnson (21) (11.11%)
  • Tony Jones (7) (11.11%)
  • Tony Lahiffe (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 9 [Tony Fennell] *
                            9 [Tony Fenelle] *
                            64 [Big Noise (4)] *
                            1 [Gary Thompson (3)] *
                            1 [Linton Levy] *
                            1 [Paul Johnson (21)] *
                            1 [Tony Jones (7)] *
                            1 [Tony Lahiffe]
                           )

                         = 5.2K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Tony Fennell] *
                            1 [Tony Fenelle] *
                            1 [Big Noise (4)] *
                            1 [Gary Thompson (3)] *
                            1 [Linton Levy] *
                            1 [Paul Johnson (21)] *
                            1 [Tony Jones (7)] *
                            1 [Tony Lahiffe]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.14% (5.2K overall)
  • This Post (1.14%)
  • Tony Fennell (10.23%)
  • Tony Fenelle (10.23%)
  • Gary Thompson (3) (1.14%)
  • Linton Levy (1.14%)
  • Paul Johnson (21) (1.14%)
  • Tony Jones (7) (1.14%)
  • Tony Lahiffe (1.14%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Big Noise (4) 72.73%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Tony Fennell (11.11%)
  • Tony Fenelle (11.11%)
  • Big Noise (4) (11.11%)
  • Gary Thompson (3) (11.11%)
  • Linton Levy (11.11%)
  • Paul Johnson (21) (11.11%)
  • Tony Jones (7) (11.11%)
  • Tony Lahiffe (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Tony Fennell ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Tony Fenelle ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Big Noise (4) ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Gary Thompson (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Linton Levy ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Johnson (21) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tony Jones (7) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tony Lahiffe ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Tony Lahiffe ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tony Jones (7) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Johnson (21) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Linton Levy ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gary Thompson (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Big Noise (4) ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Tony Fenelle ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Tony Fennell ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Big Noise (4)
Inbound Posts (1)
Big Noise (4)
Last calculated: Jun 30, 3:44 PM
27

Related Content

No related content found.