Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Ole Kristian LøvbergStein SundEvig NattKirsten JÃ ̧rgensenThor Erik HelgesenArne Marton TangjerdRuben Osnes

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Harald Helgeson

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Evig Natt

Connected Musicians

  • Arne Marton Tangjerd
  • Kirsten JÃ ̧rgensen
  • Ole Kristian Løvberg
  • Ruben Osnes
  • Stein Sund
  • Thor Erik Helgesen

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.89% of network
(21.6K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.89%)
  • Stein Sund (8.04%)
  • Arne Marton Tangjerd (0.89%)
  • Ruben Osnes (0.89%)
  • Thor Erik Helgesen (0.89%)
  • Kirsten JÃ ̧rgensen (0.89%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Evig Natt 43.75%Ole Kristian Løvberg 43.75%
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Evig Natt (12.50%)
  • Ole Kristian Løvberg (12.50%)
  • Stein Sund (12.50%)
  • Arne Marton Tangjerd (12.50%)
  • Ruben Osnes (12.50%)
  • Thor Erik Helgesen (12.50%)
  • Kirsten JÃ ̧rgensen (12.50%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 49 [Evig Natt] *
                            49 [Ole Kristian Løvberg] *
                            9 [Stein Sund] *
                            1 [Arne Marton Tangjerd] *
                            1 [Ruben Osnes] *
                            1 [Thor Erik Helgesen] *
                            1 [Kirsten JÃ ̧rgensen]
                           )

                         = 21.6K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Evig Natt] *
                            1 [Ole Kristian Løvberg] *
                            1 [Stein Sund] *
                            1 [Arne Marton Tangjerd] *
                            1 [Ruben Osnes] *
                            1 [Thor Erik Helgesen] *
                            1 [Kirsten JÃ ̧rgensen]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.89% (21.6K overall)
  • This Post (0.89%)
  • Stein Sund (8.04%)
  • Arne Marton Tangjerd (0.89%)
  • Ruben Osnes (0.89%)
  • Thor Erik Helgesen (0.89%)
  • Kirsten JÃ ̧rgensen (0.89%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Evig Natt 43.75%Ole Kristian Løvberg 43.75%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Evig Natt (12.50%)
  • Ole Kristian Løvberg (12.50%)
  • Stein Sund (12.50%)
  • Arne Marton Tangjerd (12.50%)
  • Ruben Osnes (12.50%)
  • Thor Erik Helgesen (12.50%)
  • Kirsten JÃ ̧rgensen (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Evig Natt ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Ole Kristian Løvberg ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Stein Sund ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Arne Marton Tangjerd ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ruben Osnes ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Thor Erik Helgesen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kirsten JÃ ̧rgensen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Kirsten JÃ ̧rgensen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Thor Erik Helgesen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ruben Osnes ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Arne Marton Tangjerd ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Stein Sund ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Ole Kristian Løvberg ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Evig Natt ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Evig Natt
Inbound Posts (1)
Evig Natt
Last calculated: Jun 30, 4:09 PM
12

Related Content

No related content found.