Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Eric Stover
Stephen Shannon
Large Mound
James LillisMark JordanHugh McCabeAnthony MackeyAnthony Darby

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 10 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Graham Mackey

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Large Mound
    Large Mound band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Anthony Darby
  • Anthony Mackey
  • Eric Stover
  • Hugh McCabe
  • James Lillis
  • Mark Jordan
  • Stephen Shannon
    Stephen Shannon band photo

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.70% of network
(84.93M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.70%)
  • Large Mound (45.07%)
  • Stephen Shannon (25.35%)
  • Mark Jordan (11.27%)
  • Anthony Mackey (6.34%)
  • James Lillis (2.82%)
  • Hugh McCabe (2.82%)
  • Anthony Darby (2.82%)
  • Eric Stover (2.82%)
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Large Mound (11.11%)
  • Stephen Shannon (11.11%)
  • Mark Jordan (11.11%)
  • James Lillis (11.11%)
  • Hugh McCabe (11.11%)
  • Anthony Mackey (11.11%)
  • Anthony Darby (11.11%)
  • Eric Stover (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [Large Mound] *
                            36 [Stephen Shannon] *
                            16 [Mark Jordan] *
                            4 [James Lillis] *
                            4 [Hugh McCabe] *
                            9 [Anthony Mackey] *
                            4 [Anthony Darby] *
                            4 [Eric Stover]
                           )

                         = 84.93M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Large Mound] *
                            1 [Stephen Shannon] *
                            1 [Mark Jordan] *
                            1 [James Lillis] *
                            1 [Hugh McCabe] *
                            1 [Anthony Mackey] *
                            1 [Anthony Darby] *
                            1 [Eric Stover]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.70% (84.93M overall)
  • This Post (0.70%)
  • Large Mound (45.07%)
  • Stephen Shannon (25.35%)
  • Mark Jordan (11.27%)
  • Anthony Mackey (6.34%)
  • James Lillis (2.82%)
  • Hugh McCabe (2.82%)
  • Anthony Darby (2.82%)
  • Eric Stover (2.82%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Large Mound (11.11%)
  • Stephen Shannon (11.11%)
  • Mark Jordan (11.11%)
  • James Lillis (11.11%)
  • Hugh McCabe (11.11%)
  • Anthony Mackey (11.11%)
  • Anthony Darby (11.11%)
  • Eric Stover (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Large Mound ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Stephen Shannon ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Mark Jordan ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
James Lillis ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Hugh McCabe ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Anthony Mackey ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Anthony Darby ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Eric Stover ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Eric Stover ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Anthony Darby ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Anthony Mackey ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Hugh McCabe ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
James Lillis ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Mark Jordan ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Stephen Shannon ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Large Mound ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Large Mound
Inbound Posts (1)
Large Mound
Last calculated: Jun 23, 4:15 PM
47

Related Content

No related content found.