Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Glass Tiger
Al Connelly
Rob LaidlawChris McNeillMichael HansonAlan FrewWayne ParkerSam ReidChris McNeilWayne Parker (2)

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 10 hours ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Glass Tiger at McPhillips Street Station, June 2011

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Glass Tiger
    Glass Tiger band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Al Connelly
    Al Connelly band photo
  • Alan Frew
  • Chris McNeil
  • Chris McNeill
  • Michael Hanson
  • Rob Laidlaw
  • Sam Reid
  • Wayne Parker
  • Wayne Parker (2)

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.85% of network
(900)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.85%)
  • Rob Laidlaw (7.63%)
  • Alan Frew (0.85%)
  • Wayne Parker (0.85%)
  • Sam Reid (0.85%)
  • Michael Hanson (0.85%)
  • Chris McNeill (0.85%)
  • Al Connelly (0.85%)
  • Wayne Parker (2) (0.85%)
  • Chris McNeil (0.85%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Glass Tiger 84.75%
Influence Score
i
9.09% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Glass Tiger (9.09%)
  • Alan Frew (9.09%)
  • Wayne Parker (9.09%)
  • Sam Reid (9.09%)
  • Michael Hanson (9.09%)
  • Chris McNeill (9.09%)
  • Al Connelly (9.09%)
  • Rob Laidlaw (9.09%)
  • Wayne Parker (2) (9.09%)
  • Chris McNeil (9.09%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 100 [Glass Tiger] *
                            1 [Alan Frew] *
                            1 [Wayne Parker] *
                            1 [Sam Reid] *
                            1 [Michael Hanson] *
                            1 [Chris McNeill] *
                            1 [Al Connelly] *
                            9 [Rob Laidlaw] *
                            1 [Wayne Parker (2)] *
                            1 [Chris McNeil]
                           )

                         = 900

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Glass Tiger] *
                            1 [Alan Frew] *
                            1 [Wayne Parker] *
                            1 [Sam Reid] *
                            1 [Michael Hanson] *
                            1 [Chris McNeill] *
                            1 [Al Connelly] *
                            1 [Rob Laidlaw] *
                            1 [Wayne Parker (2)] *
                            1 [Chris McNeil]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.85% (900 overall)
  • This Post (0.85%)
  • Rob Laidlaw (7.63%)
  • Alan Frew (0.85%)
  • Wayne Parker (0.85%)
  • Sam Reid (0.85%)
  • Michael Hanson (0.85%)
  • Chris McNeill (0.85%)
  • Al Connelly (0.85%)
  • Wayne Parker (2) (0.85%)
  • Chris McNeil (0.85%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Glass Tiger 84.75%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.09% (1 overall)
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Glass Tiger (9.09%)
  • Alan Frew (9.09%)
  • Wayne Parker (9.09%)
  • Sam Reid (9.09%)
  • Michael Hanson (9.09%)
  • Chris McNeill (9.09%)
  • Al Connelly (9.09%)
  • Rob Laidlaw (9.09%)
  • Wayne Parker (2) (9.09%)
  • Chris McNeil (9.09%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Glass Tiger ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Alan Frew ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Wayne Parker ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sam Reid ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Hanson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Chris McNeill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Al Connelly ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Rob Laidlaw ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Wayne Parker (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Chris McNeil ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Chris McNeil ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Wayne Parker (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Rob Laidlaw ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Al Connelly ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Chris McNeill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Hanson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sam Reid ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Wayne Parker ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Alan Frew ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Glass Tiger ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Glass Tiger
Inbound Posts (1)
Glass Tiger
Last calculated: Jul 4, 1:04 AM
5

Related Content

No related content found.