Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Barry ClifftGraham HollisTerry RowleyWill HaywardGraham CrewJake ElcockThe MontanasBrian EustaceIan Lees (2)John Jones (9)

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 6 hours ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 16 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

George Davis (27)

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • The Montanas

Connected Musicians

  • Allen Austin (3)
  • Barry Clifft
  • Brian Eustace
  • Graham Crew
  • Graham Hollis
  • Ian Lees (2)
  • Jake Elcock
  • John Jones (9)
  • Terry Rowley
  • Will Hayward

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.74% of network
(484)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.74%)
  • Terry Rowley (2.96%)
  • Allen Austin (3) (0.74%)
  • Barry Clifft (0.74%)
  • Brian Eustace (0.74%)
  • Graham Crew (0.74%)
  • Graham Hollis (0.74%)
  • Ian Lees (2) (0.74%)
  • Jake Elcock (0.74%)
  • John Jones (9) (0.74%)
  • Will Hayward (0.74%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Montanas 89.63%
Influence Score
i
8.33% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • The Montanas (8.33%)
  • Terry Rowley (8.33%)
  • Allen Austin (3) (8.33%)
  • Barry Clifft (8.33%)
  • Brian Eustace (8.33%)
  • Graham Crew (8.33%)
  • Graham Hollis (8.33%)
  • Ian Lees (2) (8.33%)
  • Jake Elcock (8.33%)
  • John Jones (9) (8.33%)
  • Will Hayward (8.33%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 11 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 121 [The Montanas] *
                            4 [Terry Rowley] *
                            1 [Allen Austin (3)] *
                            1 [Barry Clifft] *
                            1 [Brian Eustace] *
                            1 [Graham Crew] *
                            1 [Graham Hollis] *
                            1 [Ian Lees (2)] *
                            1 [Jake Elcock] *
                            1 [John Jones (9)] *
                            1 [Will Hayward]
                           )

                         = 484

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [The Montanas] *
                            1 [Terry Rowley] *
                            1 [Allen Austin (3)] *
                            1 [Barry Clifft] *
                            1 [Brian Eustace] *
                            1 [Graham Crew] *
                            1 [Graham Hollis] *
                            1 [Ian Lees (2)] *
                            1 [Jake Elcock] *
                            1 [John Jones (9)] *
                            1 [Will Hayward]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 11 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.74% (484 overall)
  • This Post (0.74%)
  • Terry Rowley (2.96%)
  • Allen Austin (3) (0.74%)
  • Barry Clifft (0.74%)
  • Brian Eustace (0.74%)
  • Graham Crew (0.74%)
  • Graham Hollis (0.74%)
  • Ian Lees (2) (0.74%)
  • Jake Elcock (0.74%)
  • John Jones (9) (0.74%)
  • Will Hayward (0.74%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Montanas 89.63%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.33% (1 overall)
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • The Montanas (8.33%)
  • Terry Rowley (8.33%)
  • Allen Austin (3) (8.33%)
  • Barry Clifft (8.33%)
  • Brian Eustace (8.33%)
  • Graham Crew (8.33%)
  • Graham Hollis (8.33%)
  • Ian Lees (2) (8.33%)
  • Jake Elcock (8.33%)
  • John Jones (9) (8.33%)
  • Will Hayward (8.33%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
The Montanas ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Terry Rowley ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Allen Austin (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Barry Clifft ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brian Eustace ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Graham Crew ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Graham Hollis ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ian Lees (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jake Elcock ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John Jones (9) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Will Hayward ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Will Hayward ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John Jones (9) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jake Elcock ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ian Lees (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Graham Hollis ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Graham Crew ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brian Eustace ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Barry Clifft ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Allen Austin (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Terry Rowley ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
The Montanas ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
The Montanas
Inbound Posts (1)
The Montanas
Last calculated: Jun 29, 9:14 PM
45

Related Content

No related content found.