How is this calculated?
The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.
// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 7) = 7
$outbound = max(1, 7) = 7
// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 7 * 7 = 49
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 7 / 7 = 1
// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 27 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
= 49 *
( 144 [Manhattan Transfer] *
64 [Janis Siegel] *
25 [Tim Hauser] *
16 [Cheryl Bentyne] *
16 [Alan Paul] *
9 [Erin Dickins] *
9 [Laurel Massé] *
9 [Marty Nelson] *
9 [Pat Rosalia] *
4 [Trist Curless] *
4 [Margaret Dorn] *
9 [Trist Ethan Curless] *
361 [Disrupt] *
4 [Terry Savastano] *
9 [Jay Stiles] *
1 [Bob Palombo] *
1 [Chris Drake (2)] *
1 [Harry Haralabatos] *
1 [Jeff Hayward] *
4 [Pete Kamarinos] *
1 [Randy Odierno] *
1 [Scott Lucid] *
1 [Buchanan Brothers (2)] *
1 [Cashman] *
1 [Uncle Louie] *
1 [Chips & Company] *
1 [Pistilli & West]
)
= 1.42 x 10^20
Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
= 1 *
( 1 [Manhattan Transfer] *
1 [Janis Siegel] *
1 [Tim Hauser] *
1 [Cheryl Bentyne] *
1 [Alan Paul] *
1 [Erin Dickins] *
1 [Laurel Massé] *
1 [Marty Nelson] *
1 [Pat Rosalia] *
1 [Trist Curless] *
1 [Margaret Dorn] *
1 [Trist Ethan Curless] *
1 [Disrupt] *
1 [Terry Savastano] *
1 [Jay Stiles] *
1 [Bob Palombo] *
1 [Chris Drake (2)] *
1 [Harry Haralabatos] *
1 [Jeff Hayward] *
1 [Pete Kamarinos] *
1 [Randy Odierno] *
1 [Scott Lucid] *
1 [Buchanan Brothers (2)] *
1 [Cashman] *
1 [Uncle Louie] *
1 [Chips & Company] *
1 [Pistilli & West]
)
= 1
Outbound
7
Tags on post
Inbound
7
Posts tagging this
Connections
27
Total nodes
Base Node Strength
49
Base Node Influence
1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
6.48%
(1.42 × 1020 overall)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)Disrupt 47.75%Manhattan Transfer 19.05%Janis Siegel 8.47%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Connected Network Hierarchy
Sort list by:
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)