Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Leo PignonThis EndingLinus NirbrantPeter Nagy (3)Linus PetterssonMårten HansenJesper LöfgrenJesper Löfgren

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 7 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Fred

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • This Ending

Connected Musicians

  • Jesper Löfgren
  • Jesper Löfgren
  • Leo Pignon
  • Linus Nirbrant
  • Linus Pettersson
  • Mårten Hansen
  • Peter Nagy (3)

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.96% of network
(589.8K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.96%)
  • Peter Nagy (3) (15.38%)
  • Linus Nirbrant (8.65%)
  • Leo Pignon (3.85%)
  • Linus Pettersson (3.85%)
  • Jesper Löfgren (3.85%)
  • Jesper Löfgren (0.96%)
  • Mårten Hansen (0.96%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
This Ending 61.54%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • This Ending (11.11%)
  • Jesper Löfgren (11.11%)
  • Leo Pignon (11.11%)
  • Mårten Hansen (11.11%)
  • Linus Nirbrant (11.11%)
  • Peter Nagy (3) (11.11%)
  • Linus Pettersson (11.11%)
  • Jesper Löfgren (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [This Ending] *
                            1 [Jesper Löfgren] *
                            4 [Leo Pignon] *
                            1 [Mårten Hansen] *
                            9 [Linus Nirbrant] *
                            16 [Peter Nagy (3)] *
                            4 [Linus Pettersson] *
                            4 [Jesper Löfgren]
                           )

                         = 589.8K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [This Ending] *
                            1 [Jesper Löfgren] *
                            1 [Leo Pignon] *
                            1 [Mårten Hansen] *
                            1 [Linus Nirbrant] *
                            1 [Peter Nagy (3)] *
                            1 [Linus Pettersson] *
                            1 [Jesper Löfgren]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.96% (589.8K overall)
  • This Post (0.96%)
  • Peter Nagy (3) (15.38%)
  • Linus Nirbrant (8.65%)
  • Leo Pignon (3.85%)
  • Linus Pettersson (3.85%)
  • Jesper Löfgren (3.85%)
  • Jesper Löfgren (0.96%)
  • Mårten Hansen (0.96%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
This Ending 61.54%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • This Ending (11.11%)
  • Jesper Löfgren (11.11%)
  • Leo Pignon (11.11%)
  • Mårten Hansen (11.11%)
  • Linus Nirbrant (11.11%)
  • Peter Nagy (3) (11.11%)
  • Linus Pettersson (11.11%)
  • Jesper Löfgren (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
This Ending ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Jesper Löfgren ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Leo Pignon ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Mårten Hansen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Linus Nirbrant ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Peter Nagy (3) ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Linus Pettersson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Jesper Löfgren ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Jesper Löfgren ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Linus Pettersson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Peter Nagy (3) ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Linus Nirbrant ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Mårten Hansen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Leo Pignon ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Jesper Löfgren ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
This Ending ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
This Ending
Inbound Posts (1)
This Ending
Last calculated: Jun 13, 10:00 AM
23

Related Content

No related content found.